Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

elleng

(141,550 posts)
13. Right.
Fri Nov 7, 2025, 10:50 PM
Nov 7

I wish that more readers would recognize distinctions between procedural and substantive; important, and many SHOULD recognize such distinctions.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

DAMN! elleng Nov 7 #1
The only rationale angrychair Nov 7 #11
Would you prefer another unsigned shadow docket decision with no possibility of reversal? flashman13 Nov 7 #16
Thanks. elleng Nov 7 #23
Post removed Post removed Nov 7 #24
"" AllaN01Bear Nov 7 #19
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson issued the stay Polybius Nov 7 #2
It was a strategic move Fiendish Thingy Nov 7 #20
As a legal analyst explained, she did it to avoid a longer stay by the full Court. SunSeeker Nov 7 #21
Thanks elleng Nov 7 #26
Thanks A Badger Nov 8 #30
Fuck this SheltieLover Nov 7 #3
It's a technicality, a procedural thing. valleyrogue Nov 7 #4
Yet the starving will occur Bmoboy Nov 7 #5
Fouled on a technicality? calimary Nov 8 #29
F*ck procedure when it f*cks people NotHardly Nov 7 #10
Right. elleng Nov 7 #13
If the court can move quickly and not inflict harm on hungry families C_U_L8R Nov 7 #6
Horrible Trueblue1968 Nov 7 #7
42 million about to die of "temporary" denial of food NotHardly Nov 7 #8
Fuck all the SCOTUS angrychair Nov 7 #9
All? Polybius Nov 8 #31
So much for "pro life". Screw every single one of these right wing assholes. BComplex Nov 7 #12
So, someone please define "temporary" for me and "as quickly as possible". hamsterjill Nov 7 #14
Here is a video that explains it a bit better Bev54 Nov 7 #15
Thanks for this. hamsterjill Nov 7 #17
So you are disappointed that she didn't deny the request which would have allowed Thomas to grant it onenote Nov 8 #32
There are several newer threads that provide significantly more information and context Fiendish Thingy Nov 7 #18
Correct. Jackson made the best of a bad situation. SunSeeker Nov 7 #25
"" AllaN01Bear Nov 7 #22
They just keep digging themselves in deeper and deeper for the mid-terms. C Moon Nov 7 #27
MOTHERFUCKERS orangecrush Nov 8 #28
SHAME ! republianmushroom Nov 8 #33
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court allows Trum...»Reply #13