Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NotHardly

(2,255 posts)
8. 42 million about to die of "temporary" denial of food
Fri Nov 7, 2025, 10:20 PM
Nov 7
Damn the 'rationale', people will starve, children will starve 'temporarily' except the deaths and deprivation will be permanent. So will the hate this ruling generates, so will the disrespect and historical degradation of the reputation of the (not so much) Supreme Court.

The average dollars$$$ received by a SNAP recipient is less than $170.00 a month... let me repeat that less than 170.00 a month and now they want to give maybe 65% of that which means a recipient they receive $110.00... wanna live on $110.00 of groceries a month?

That is $27.50 a week. So called government "aid". That is a lot of gruel and turnip soup, if you are lucky to have your Social Security, Walmart greeter wages, minimum wage job and Food Bank or dumpster diving lets you keep you housing.

I'm old enough to remember when we laughed at Russian solders were stealing toilets from Ukrainian families because they didn't have them in their own homes. Not the plumbing, which they did not understand, just the toilets so they no longer had do squat to take shit.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

DAMN! elleng Nov 7 #1
The only rationale angrychair Nov 7 #11
Would you prefer another unsigned shadow docket decision with no possibility of reversal? flashman13 Nov 7 #16
Thanks. elleng Nov 7 #23
Post removed Post removed Nov 7 #24
"" AllaN01Bear Nov 7 #19
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson issued the stay Polybius Nov 7 #2
It was a strategic move Fiendish Thingy Nov 7 #20
As a legal analyst explained, she did it to avoid a longer stay by the full Court. SunSeeker Nov 7 #21
Thanks elleng Nov 7 #26
Thanks A Badger Nov 8 #30
Fuck this SheltieLover Nov 7 #3
It's a technicality, a procedural thing. valleyrogue Nov 7 #4
Yet the starving will occur Bmoboy Nov 7 #5
Fouled on a technicality? calimary Nov 8 #29
F*ck procedure when it f*cks people NotHardly Nov 7 #10
Right. elleng Nov 7 #13
If the court can move quickly and not inflict harm on hungry families C_U_L8R Nov 7 #6
Horrible Trueblue1968 Nov 7 #7
42 million about to die of "temporary" denial of food NotHardly Nov 7 #8
Fuck all the SCOTUS angrychair Nov 7 #9
All? Polybius Nov 8 #31
So much for "pro life". Screw every single one of these right wing assholes. BComplex Nov 7 #12
So, someone please define "temporary" for me and "as quickly as possible". hamsterjill Nov 7 #14
Here is a video that explains it a bit better Bev54 Nov 7 #15
Thanks for this. hamsterjill Nov 7 #17
So you are disappointed that she didn't deny the request which would have allowed Thomas to grant it onenote Nov 8 #32
There are several newer threads that provide significantly more information and context Fiendish Thingy Nov 7 #18
Correct. Jackson made the best of a bad situation. SunSeeker Nov 7 #25
"" AllaN01Bear Nov 7 #22
They just keep digging themselves in deeper and deeper for the mid-terms. C Moon Nov 7 #27
MOTHERFUCKERS orangecrush Nov 8 #28
SHAME ! republianmushroom Nov 8 #33
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court allows Trum...»Reply #8