Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FBaggins

(28,592 posts)
7. The game that neither side will admit
Fri Nov 7, 2025, 08:02 AM
Nov 7

Other than the filibuster (which can’t touch executive actions) - the only remaining tools to oppose Trump are friendly judges who are willing to make temporary rulings that have no chance of surviving (at least with this court) but which can stand potentially for years while the judge stretches out the court timeline… potentially past the end of the administration. So the “temporary” order has the effect of a veto in the policy.

The longstanding preference at SCOTUS has been to wait for actual rulings to be made and appeals to be heard so that they have a full record to review. KBJ’s criticism is well-founded… but it isn’t going to change anything because it assumes that he game hasn’t changed.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»'Misunderstood the assign...»Reply #7