Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

fujiyamasan

(988 posts)

11. Same with JD...

Reply to slightlv (Reply #8)

Fri Nov 7, 2025, 01:51 AM

Nov 7

He’s gotta dump the brown devil worshipping woman and get the blonde Christian widow with the leather pants.

Now, if the Supreme Court explicitly banned relationships with furniture… that’s a different story.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

EuterpeThelo 2MuchNoise

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court v. Gay Marriage: Jim Obergefell's Warning as Precedent Tested [View all] BumRushDaShow Nov 6 OP

Is there any reference to marriage in the Constitution? sinkingfeeling Nov 6 #1

No but there is the Equal Protection Clause to the 14th Amendment TomSlick Nov 6 #3

I totally agree dickthegrouch Nov 6 #5

You can't have two classes of citizens COL Mustard Nov 6 #7

He should be concerned. maxsolomon Nov 6 #2

Ginny and Clarence Should Worry Too 2na fisherman Nov 6 #4

You got that right! IzzaNuDay Nov 6 #6

I'm not sure Clarence isn't looking for some face-saving way to get rid of Ginni, actually. nt slightlv Nov 6 #8

Same with JD... fujiyamasan Nov 7 #11

I think the Supreme Court is corrupt as hell CozyMystery Nov 6 #9

This would have to be all or nothing by the USSC. valleyrogue Nov 6 #10

"Kicking it back to the states ala Dobbs doesn't work in this case because some benefits... are federal." BumRushDaShow Nov 7 #12