Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

IzzaNuDay

(1,193 posts)

6. You got that right!

Reply to 2na fisherman (Reply #4)

Thu Nov 6, 2025, 08:16 PM

Nov 6

First they came for the LGTBQ community, Loving vs. Virginia could be next in the list.

Perhaps JD might want to warn SCOTUS to leave enough alone…. knock some sense into Clarence especially!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

DBoon 2na fisherman

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court v. Gay Marriage: Jim Obergefell's Warning as Precedent Tested [View all] BumRushDaShow Nov 6 OP

Is there any reference to marriage in the Constitution? sinkingfeeling Nov 6 #1

No but there is the Equal Protection Clause to the 14th Amendment TomSlick Nov 6 #3

I totally agree dickthegrouch Nov 6 #5

You can't have two classes of citizens COL Mustard Nov 6 #7

He should be concerned. maxsolomon Nov 6 #2

Ginny and Clarence Should Worry Too 2na fisherman Nov 6 #4

You got that right! IzzaNuDay Nov 6 #6

I'm not sure Clarence isn't looking for some face-saving way to get rid of Ginni, actually. nt slightlv Nov 6 #8

Same with JD... fujiyamasan Nov 7 #11

I think the Supreme Court is corrupt as hell CozyMystery Nov 6 #9

This would have to be all or nothing by the USSC. valleyrogue Nov 6 #10

"Kicking it back to the states ala Dobbs doesn't work in this case because some benefits... are federal." BumRushDaShow Nov 7 #12