Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Jury finds D.C. sandwich thrower Sean Dunn not guilty of misdemeanor assault [View all]SunSeeker
(57,263 posts)No reasonable person could credibly claim they feared "immediate bodily harm" by having a wrapped Subway sandwich bounce off their ballistic vest. Gregory Lairmore, the agent with U.S. Customs and Border Protection, who was wearing a bulletproof vest, falsely told jurors the sandwich "exploded," which was contradicted by scene photos and video, and he admitted he wasn't hurt. https://www.npr.org/2025/11/06/nx-s1-5600772/trump-justice-federal-surge-subway-sandwich
Judge Carl J. Nichols instructed the jury that to convict Dunn, they would have to find he acted forcibly and generated a reasonable apprehension of immediate bodily harm. https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2025/11/06/dc-sandwich-guy-trial-trump-federal-takeover/
This was not really jury nullification. These jurors simply applied the facts to the law, and properly found Dunn not guilty.