Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: 'You Do!' Gorsuch Calls Out Trump Lawyer For Arguing Congress 'Can Hand Off' Power to Declare War to President [View all]well said........Gorsuch is such an entitled snobbish ugh..........just hearing him speak makes my hackles go up.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
'You Do!' Gorsuch Calls Out Trump Lawyer For Arguing Congress 'Can Hand Off' Power to Declare War to President [View all]
BumRushDaShow
Nov 5
OP
"wholesale abdication." That's pretty much what the Republicans in congress have done!
progressoid
Nov 5
#1
Because they have already seen 45 and his cabal, wantonly violating court orders with no repercussions
BumRushDaShow
Nov 5
#5
So are they moving toward protecting separation of powers? If so, what does that mean for the Roberts court legacy?
ancianita
Nov 5
#7
I fixed my reply to indicate "eliminate Legislative Branch" vs Executive Branch
BumRushDaShow
Nov 5
#19
Nothing can turn the "legacy" of the Roberts corrupt supreme court, into a good "legacy".
Escurumbele
Nov 5
#14
Lets hope they found their spine and they are not just acting, that is what happened with the so called
Escurumbele
Nov 5
#12
maga judges might be waking up to find their immunity ruling has come back to bite them --
ancianita
Nov 5
#17
Agree but wasn't it a stipulation of the "immunity" that was granted the fact that THEY would determine an immune act
Cheezoholic
Nov 5
#20
Sure. They said that. Now let's see how they work it to the benefit of themselves.
ancianita
Nov 5
#23
One thing about the shadow docket: The decisions can be challenged as failing to create any sort of binding precedent.
pat_k
Nov 5
#35
But the problem is that they allow the "move fast and break things" rapid destruction of many insitutions
BumRushDaShow
Nov 6
#37