Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: 'You Do!' Gorsuch Calls Out Trump Lawyer For Arguing Congress 'Can Hand Off' Power to Declare War to President [View all]BumRushDaShow
(163,360 posts)37. But the problem is that they allow the "move fast and break things" rapid destruction of many insitutions
and by the time the lower courts finish their review and final decision, making them now available for a final SCOTUS appeal ruling (if they even accept an appeal), there's nothing left.
USAID is an example.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
'You Do!' Gorsuch Calls Out Trump Lawyer For Arguing Congress 'Can Hand Off' Power to Declare War to President [View all]
BumRushDaShow
Nov 5
OP
"wholesale abdication." That's pretty much what the Republicans in congress have done!
progressoid
Nov 5
#1
Because they have already seen 45 and his cabal, wantonly violating court orders with no repercussions
BumRushDaShow
Nov 5
#5
So are they moving toward protecting separation of powers? If so, what does that mean for the Roberts court legacy?
ancianita
Nov 5
#7
I fixed my reply to indicate "eliminate Legislative Branch" vs Executive Branch
BumRushDaShow
Nov 5
#19
Nothing can turn the "legacy" of the Roberts corrupt supreme court, into a good "legacy".
Escurumbele
Nov 5
#14
Lets hope they found their spine and they are not just acting, that is what happened with the so called
Escurumbele
Nov 5
#12
maga judges might be waking up to find their immunity ruling has come back to bite them --
ancianita
Nov 5
#17
Agree but wasn't it a stipulation of the "immunity" that was granted the fact that THEY would determine an immune act
Cheezoholic
Nov 5
#20
Sure. They said that. Now let's see how they work it to the benefit of themselves.
ancianita
Nov 5
#23
One thing about the shadow docket: The decisions can be challenged as failing to create any sort of binding precedent.
pat_k
Nov 5
#35
But the problem is that they allow the "move fast and break things" rapid destruction of many insitutions
BumRushDaShow
Nov 6
#37