Latest Breaking News

ShazzieB

(21,959 posts)

5. Andrew Mountbatten Windsor could, at least in theory, be charged in US courts.

Tue Nov 4, 2025, 02:52 PM

Nov 4

I don't know where Jamie got his numbers, but I think Andrew could certainly be on the list of co-conspirators. He was a frequent, repeat visitor to Epstein's Manhattan digs for years and could be charged for any crimes committed while he was there. I'm not sure about any of Epstein's other residences in the US, like Palm Beach, but crimes done anywhere in the US could certainly be prosecuted in US courts.

How likely any of that is to happen is another matter, which is why I said "in theory." But he certainly seems more vulnerable now that the royal family has kicked him and his ex wife all the way to the curb.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

FakeNoose

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

House Democrats press DOJ for details on Epstein co-conspirators probe that was "inexplicably killed" [View all] BumRushDaShow Nov 4 OP

I wonder why Rep. Raskin doesn't name the "alleged" co-conspirators in this letter FakeNoose Nov 4 #1

That is roughly the number of people Guiffre alleged Epstein directed her to give "massages" to AZJonnie Nov 4 #3

Andrew Mountbatten Windsor could, at least in theory, be charged in US courts. ShazzieB Nov 4 #5

OK that much makes sense FakeNoose Nov 4 #7

I believe that was a civil lawsuit, so no criminal charges would have been involved. ShazzieB Nov 5 #9

I would be keen to know what their answer is on this question, and I love me some Jamie Raskin! AZJonnie Nov 4 #2

There's no "bipartisan interest" in Congress going after pedophiles KS Toronado Nov 4 #4

There are 2 GOPers - Massie and MTG BumRushDaShow Nov 4 #6

I stand corrected again KS Toronado Nov 4 #8