Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BumRushDaShow

(160,948 posts)
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 06:00 PM Saturday

Not 'the gospel.' Ahead of Supreme Court term, Clarence Thomas weighs in on precedent [View all]

Source: USA Today

Updated Sept. 27, 2025, 10:50 a.m. ET


WASHINGTON – As the Supreme Court is about to revisit some major decisions, one of the nine justices - and a key member of the conservative majority - has offered his view that there’s nothing sacred about precedent.

"At some point we need to think about what we're doing with stare decisis,” Justice Clarence Thomas said about the legal term that protects stability in the law. "And it's not some sort of talismanic deal where you can just say 'stare decisis' and not think, turn off the brain.”

Thomas offered that view in a rare public appearance at Catholic University's Columbus School of Law on Sept. 25. He was asked about the factors he considers when deciding whether a past decision was wrong and did not address any pending cases.

In the term that begins next month, the court will revisit a nearly century-old ruling protecting the heads of independent agencies that President Donald Trump has repeatedly challenged as he’s sought greater control over the government.

Read more: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/09/27/supreme-court-justice-clarence-thomas-precedent-overturn/86390719007/



Thurgood Marshall is rolling in his grave throwing things.
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How about "stare decisis" ruling on the real meaning of the 2nd amendment? Opps. forgot that is the whole basis of LiberalArkie Saturday #1
Just forget elleng Saturday #3
He's setting the precedent otchmoson Saturday #2
That's exactly what I thought when I first read the headline! slightlv Saturday #12
Marriage for our LGBTQ citizens yankee87 Saturday #4
And hello anti-miscegenation laws again (Loving v. Virginia) BumRushDaShow Saturday #8
Doesn't that mean he just made the Supreme Court Buddyzbuddy Saturday #5
WHEN we take back our country, slightlv Saturday #13
Absolutely Buddyzbuddy Sunday #19
Even the gospel isn't the gospel to that crudball Marthe48 Saturday #6
Well they aren't even thinking Raven123 Saturday #7
He means to give trump everything he ever dreamed of, Bayard Saturday #9
Meaning Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Saturday #10
How's the gratuities and tips coming in Thomas ? republianmushroom Saturday #11
The kind the tax breaks were REALLY meant for, not a couple bucks for a waitress ;) n/t Cheezoholic Saturday #16
Turn off the brain? Gimpyknee Saturday #14
Wai-wai-wait! They're not quoting His Honour properly (with your kind indulgence) AHEM!!... Montauk6 Saturday #15
What about Virginia vs. Loving, Clarence? QED Saturday #17
Loving, schmuving otchmoson Sunday #21
Right-wingers have wanted to revese the decisions that legalized the New Deal, Social Security, etc.... JHB Saturday #18
Wonder what his "tip" was for saying that? rurallib Sunday #20
Remember those words you just used, you corrupt, treasonous piece of shit. Scalded Nun Sunday #22
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Not 'the gospel.' Ahead o...