Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cirsium

(2,915 posts)
28. Why?
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 05:17 PM
Saturday

I think they are targeting people deemed unworthy, similarity to what was done in Germany during the early stages of the Nazi regime. "Lebensunwertes Leben." It is the predictable next step in the catastrophic course down which we are being driven.

In a time when the voices of neurodivergent individuals are only beginning to be heard and valued on their own terms, it is deeply disturbing to witness public figures—especially those seeking high office—revive narratives that dehumanise and diminish them. Recent comments by Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., suggesting that autistic individuals are a “burden” on society due to their inability to “work” or “pay taxes,” warrant not just outrage—but reflection. These are not merely careless remarks; they are emblematic of a deeper, more insidious problem: the resurgence of a logic that history has already exposed as deadly.

To understand the gravity of such rhetoric, we must revisit one of the most chilling ideological and bureaucratic programmes of the 20th century: Aktion T4 in Nazi Germany. Between 1939 and 1945, this state-sanctioned “euthanasia” programme targeted individuals deemed “Lebensunwertes Leben”—“life unworthy of life.” The victims were not soldiers, criminals, or political opponents; they were disabled children, neurodivergent individuals, people with mental illness or intellectual disabilities—those who, in the regime’s cold estimation, failed to meet a standard of economic or biological “fitness.”

Before the gas chambers of Auschwitz and Sobibor, before the industrialised murder of millions, came the sterilisation clinics and “mercy killings” in German hospitals. These early atrocities were justified not on the grounds of hatred or vengeance, but on economics. The Nazi regime framed the existence of disabled and neurodivergent people as a financial burden on the state. In internal documents and propaganda, their continued care was described as wasteful, inefficient, and unfair to the productive majority. The German term Ausmerzen, meaning “to eradicate,” was used to describe this policy of quiet, systematic elimination.

The machinery of death began not with bullets or gas—but with ideas. With speeches. With normalised conversations about who “contributes” to society, and who does not. And now, nearly a century later, we are hearing faint but unmistakable echoes of that same logic.

https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/life-unworthy-of-life-historical-amnesia-ausmerzen-and-the-rhetoric-surrounding-autism/

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

leucovorin-I have no doubt that some Republicans are making a ton of money off this stuff Walleye Saturday #1
You didn't see them generations ago bc they were warehoused in insane asylums. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Saturday #2
Exactly. Timeflyer Saturday #6
Or the family attic Hekate Saturday #29
Or died. RedArkGuy Saturday #38
it wasn't REPORTED as much generations ago Skittles Saturday #3
Yes and just lived out their lives "Hermits" and 'Non-social" or "Anti-social" or "Non-conformists" LiberalArkie Saturday #5
wow, another post worth of its own thread Skittles Saturday #22
Something I did not figure out until about a year ago, A lot of us can not say NO. LiberalArkie Saturday #24
had never thought of that Skittles Saturday #26
You must tell him as most guys do not know or realize it. I wondered most of my life why I could not keep anything LiberalArkie Saturday #30
alas my brother passed in 2021 Skittles Saturday #33
I am so sorry to hear that. LiberalArkie Sunday #41
Why? Cirsium Saturday #28
For personal reasons............... Lovie777 Saturday #4
same Skittles Saturday #23
What?! yardwork Saturday #7
Apparently he has never heard of science or history. mwmisses4289 Saturday #8
Good Lord. yardwork Saturday #9
It's not in their "world" (that they are willing to admit to) BumRushDaShow Saturday #10
Dr. Malarky Marthe48 Saturday #11
There is definitely a strong genetic component. High-functioning autism runs in our family across 4 generations Martin68 Saturday #12
It's definitely a continuum. yardwork Saturday #16
"I don't believe" PSPS Saturday #13
Quack, Quack, Quack, Quack, Quack, Quack, BootinUp Saturday #14
Quack back at ya. twodogsbarking Saturday #15
The modern-day phenomenon liberalgunwilltravel Saturday #17
I think there is a genetic component NH Ethylene Saturday #18
Autism is not new. ananda Saturday #19
But recognition and diagnosis have changed drastically over the years. eppur_se_muova Saturday #31
I don't exactly consider autism a defect. ananda Saturday #32
Call it a 'condition', then. Whatever you call it, it is something which only slowly came to be recognized. eppur_se_muova Saturday #34
Of course it exists. ananda Saturday #35
This message was self-deleted by its author valleyrogue Saturday #37
What I don't understand is why a high functioning and low functioning autism are both autism womanofthehills Saturday #36
He is shockingly uninformed. Tanuki Saturday #20
I would have been 14. I remember that article vividly. 3catwoman3 Saturday #21
I don't think he knows what he's talking about struggle4progress Saturday #25
Rosemary Kennedy was given a frontal chelsea0011 Saturday #27
We are different. Aussie105 Sunday #39
Sigh lonely bird Sunday #40
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»FDA Commissioner Dr. Mart...»Reply #28