Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary tells Scripps News 'I don't think autism is genetic' [View all]I think they are targeting people deemed unworthy, similarity to what was done in Germany during the early stages of the Nazi regime. "Lebensunwertes Leben." It is the predictable next step in the catastrophic course down which we are being driven.
In a time when the voices of neurodivergent individuals are only beginning to be heard and valued on their own terms, it is deeply disturbing to witness public figuresespecially those seeking high officerevive narratives that dehumanise and diminish them. Recent comments by Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., suggesting that autistic individuals are a burden on society due to their inability to work or pay taxes, warrant not just outragebut reflection. These are not merely careless remarks; they are emblematic of a deeper, more insidious problem: the resurgence of a logic that history has already exposed as deadly.
To understand the gravity of such rhetoric, we must revisit one of the most chilling ideological and bureaucratic programmes of the 20th century: Aktion T4 in Nazi Germany. Between 1939 and 1945, this state-sanctioned euthanasia programme targeted individuals deemed Lebensunwertes Lebenlife unworthy of life. The victims were not soldiers, criminals, or political opponents; they were disabled children, neurodivergent individuals, people with mental illness or intellectual disabilitiesthose who, in the regimes cold estimation, failed to meet a standard of economic or biological fitness.
Before the gas chambers of Auschwitz and Sobibor, before the industrialised murder of millions, came the sterilisation clinics and mercy killings in German hospitals. These early atrocities were justified not on the grounds of hatred or vengeance, but on economics. The Nazi regime framed the existence of disabled and neurodivergent people as a financial burden on the state. In internal documents and propaganda, their continued care was described as wasteful, inefficient, and unfair to the productive majority. The German term Ausmerzen, meaning to eradicate, was used to describe this policy of quiet, systematic elimination.
The machinery of death began not with bullets or gasbut with ideas. With speeches. With normalised conversations about who contributes to society, and who does not. And now, nearly a century later, we are hearing faint but unmistakable echoes of that same logic.
https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/life-unworthy-of-life-historical-amnesia-ausmerzen-and-the-rhetoric-surrounding-autism/
To understand the gravity of such rhetoric, we must revisit one of the most chilling ideological and bureaucratic programmes of the 20th century: Aktion T4 in Nazi Germany. Between 1939 and 1945, this state-sanctioned euthanasia programme targeted individuals deemed Lebensunwertes Lebenlife unworthy of life. The victims were not soldiers, criminals, or political opponents; they were disabled children, neurodivergent individuals, people with mental illness or intellectual disabilitiesthose who, in the regimes cold estimation, failed to meet a standard of economic or biological fitness.
Before the gas chambers of Auschwitz and Sobibor, before the industrialised murder of millions, came the sterilisation clinics and mercy killings in German hospitals. These early atrocities were justified not on the grounds of hatred or vengeance, but on economics. The Nazi regime framed the existence of disabled and neurodivergent people as a financial burden on the state. In internal documents and propaganda, their continued care was described as wasteful, inefficient, and unfair to the productive majority. The German term Ausmerzen, meaning to eradicate, was used to describe this policy of quiet, systematic elimination.
The machinery of death began not with bullets or gasbut with ideas. With speeches. With normalised conversations about who contributes to society, and who does not. And now, nearly a century later, we are hearing faint but unmistakable echoes of that same logic.
https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/life-unworthy-of-life-historical-amnesia-ausmerzen-and-the-rhetoric-surrounding-autism/
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary tells Scripps News 'I don't think autism is genetic' [View all]
BumRushDaShow
Saturday
OP
leucovorin-I have no doubt that some Republicans are making a ton of money off this stuff
Walleye
Saturday
#1
You didn't see them generations ago bc they were warehoused in insane asylums. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Saturday
#2
Yes and just lived out their lives "Hermits" and 'Non-social" or "Anti-social" or "Non-conformists"
LiberalArkie
Saturday
#5
Something I did not figure out until about a year ago, A lot of us can not say NO.
LiberalArkie
Saturday
#24
You must tell him as most guys do not know or realize it. I wondered most of my life why I could not keep anything
LiberalArkie
Saturday
#30
There is definitely a strong genetic component. High-functioning autism runs in our family across 4 generations
Martin68
Saturday
#12
Call it a 'condition', then. Whatever you call it, it is something which only slowly came to be recognized.
eppur_se_muova
Saturday
#34
What I don't understand is why a high functioning and low functioning autism are both autism
womanofthehills
Saturday
#36