White House rescission strategy worries some GOP appropriators [View all]
Source: Roll Call
Posted September 12, 2025 at 3:53pm
Key House GOP appropriators are raising concerns about the White Houses use of a legally untested budgetary tool to terminate billions in foreign aid funds as the Supreme Court decides whether to weigh in on a tactic that could overhaul congressional funding power. Hard-line conservatives have cheered on the Trump administrations use of a so-called pocket rescission as the White House seeks to cancel the foreign aid funds money that is now at the center of a legal dispute before the Supreme Court.
Several key Republican appropriators in the House are expressing caution about the long-term implications of the tactic, saying it could be a double-edged sword for Republicans down the line if a Democratic president wishes to target funding liked by conservatives.
In late August, the White House told Congress it was unilaterally terminating $4.9 billion in foreign aid appropriations through a pocket rescission. Rep. Harold Rogers, R-Ky., a longtime appropriator who leads the House Commerce-Justice-Science Appropriations Subcommittee, said he doesnt agree with the presidents use of a pocket rescission.
It negates appropriations, Rogers said. And I think the Constitution, with the power of the purse resting in the Congress, negates any rescissions.
Read more: https://rollcall.com/2025/09/12/white-house-rescission-strategy-worries-some-gop-appropriators/
It negates appropriations, Rogers said. And I think the Constitution, with the power of the purse resting in the Congress, negates any rescissions.
Ya think?