Latest Breaking News

onenote

(45,636 posts)

21. Did you read the opinion?

Thu Sep 11, 2025, 09:53 PM

Thursday

The court ruled that it was bound by precedent to find that it lacked jurisdiction over the suit to the extent it sought monetary relief relating to past grants -- such cases are contractual in nature and must be considered by the Federal Court of Claims, not the District Court. The irreparable harm analysis did not have anything to do with the billion dollars in grants that were retrospectively voided.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

A Badger GiqueCee scipan

40 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge allows Trump to cut more than $1bn in National Science Foundation grants [View all] BumRushDaShow Thursday OP

So much for the courts orangecrush Thursday #1

I imagine Trump and Republicans are very proud of this disaster! riversedge Thursday #2

The Stated Reason Is Vacuous ProfessorGAC Thursday #3

Yeah that seems pretty suss AZJonnie Thursday #6

Did you read the opinion? onenote Thursday #21

No. ProfessorGAC Friday #35

This message was self-deleted by its author onenote Friday #36

The article was accurate and not "horribly misleading" onenote Friday #37

Wrong ProfessorGAC Friday #38

This message was self-deleted by its author onenote Friday #39

Wow. You're so convincing. Not onenote Friday #40

Do judges hate Americans or is Trump giving them a cut of the crime profits? Irish_Dem Thursday #4

Good question. And what really sucks is that this was a Biden appointee AZJonnie Thursday #7

Maybe some of them are on the Epstein list. Irish_Dem Thursday #8

I think you're well-versed on my general opinion re: this topic by now AZJonnie Thursday #9

We simply do not know how far and wide the Putin/Trump tentacles reach. Irish_Dem Thursday #15

Lets just say I'm a lot more inclined to believe in the corrupting power of the TrumPutin tentacles AZJonnie Thursday #19

Honey there are all the exact same tentacles. Irish_Dem Friday #28

Or maybe she just happens to think it's in his constitutional boundaries to do so, even if she happens to disagree Polybius Thursday #14

Funny how the constitutional boundaries are mostly in the Trump Crime Syndicate's favor. Irish_Dem Thursday #17

what about "no backsies" ??? nt orleans Thursday #18

Do you know if there is any further news on the administrative fee cap (from your related article)? AZJonnie Thursday #5

When I was looking for any threads associated with the OP's case (which I couldn't find - it was filed in D.C.) BumRushDaShow Thursday #11

Fair enough. But if the regime wins on the 15% cap case as well, I think we'd be looking at a HUGE hit to funding AZJonnie Thursday #13

Whoops! They forgot to name the District Court Judge ... Jia M. Cobb FakeNoose Thursday #10

The grant money needs more time to process through Trump's accounts. miyazaki Thursday #12

great! now this whole damn country can be as STUPID AS THAT FUCKING JUDGE! nt orleans Thursday #16

Not sure I'd call this particular judge stupid AZJonnie Thursday #20

My guess is that most if not all of the posts slagging this judge haven't read the decision. onenote Thursday #22

Less Money For Science, More Money For Clarence Thomas DrFunkenstein Thursday #23

So much for breach of contract iemanja Thursday #24

Yes, but you have to go to the right court. onenote Friday #31

Antiscience goons at play kyburbonkid Friday #25

"Did you read the opinion?" J_William_Ryan Friday #26

Yeap. Bout half. kyburbonkid Friday #27

How far do I have to dig Conjuay Friday #29

FakeNoose posted upthread BumRushDaShow Friday #32

Make cancer great again. Vinca Friday #30

Read one note's... GiqueCee Friday #33

Project 2025 dumbing down America for the fat orange imbecile wolfie001 Friday #34