Latest Breaking News

AZJonnie

(1,486 posts)

6. Yeah that seems pretty suss

Thu Sep 11, 2025, 07:40 PM

Thursday

I don't think this is the 'final answer' on the topic though fortunately. I think the context is that plaintiffs would not be irreparably harmed without injunctive relief at this moment. Which I disagree with based on my limited understanding re: how such things work, but of course INAL.

Hopefully one of our many real-life lawyers on DU will soon come round and fill us in on the deets

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

40 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge allows Trump to cut more than $1bn in National Science Foundation grants [View all] BumRushDaShow Thursday OP

So much for the courts orangecrush Thursday #1

I imagine Trump and Republicans are very proud of this disaster! riversedge Thursday #2

The Stated Reason Is Vacuous ProfessorGAC Thursday #3

Yeah that seems pretty suss AZJonnie Thursday #6

Did you read the opinion? onenote Thursday #21

No. ProfessorGAC Friday #35

This message was self-deleted by its author onenote Friday #36

The article was accurate and not "horribly misleading" onenote Friday #37

Wrong ProfessorGAC Friday #38

This message was self-deleted by its author onenote Friday #39

Wow. You're so convincing. Not onenote Friday #40

Do judges hate Americans or is Trump giving them a cut of the crime profits? Irish_Dem Thursday #4

Good question. And what really sucks is that this was a Biden appointee AZJonnie Thursday #7

Maybe some of them are on the Epstein list. Irish_Dem Thursday #8

I think you're well-versed on my general opinion re: this topic by now AZJonnie Thursday #9

We simply do not know how far and wide the Putin/Trump tentacles reach. Irish_Dem Thursday #15

Lets just say I'm a lot more inclined to believe in the corrupting power of the TrumPutin tentacles AZJonnie Thursday #19

Honey there are all the exact same tentacles. Irish_Dem Friday #28

Or maybe she just happens to think it's in his constitutional boundaries to do so, even if she happens to disagree Polybius Thursday #14

Funny how the constitutional boundaries are mostly in the Trump Crime Syndicate's favor. Irish_Dem Thursday #17

what about "no backsies" ??? nt orleans Thursday #18

Do you know if there is any further news on the administrative fee cap (from your related article)? AZJonnie Thursday #5

When I was looking for any threads associated with the OP's case (which I couldn't find - it was filed in D.C.) BumRushDaShow Thursday #11

Fair enough. But if the regime wins on the 15% cap case as well, I think we'd be looking at a HUGE hit to funding AZJonnie Thursday #13

Whoops! They forgot to name the District Court Judge ... Jia M. Cobb FakeNoose Thursday #10

The grant money needs more time to process through Trump's accounts. miyazaki Thursday #12

great! now this whole damn country can be as STUPID AS THAT FUCKING JUDGE! nt orleans Thursday #16

Not sure I'd call this particular judge stupid AZJonnie Thursday #20

My guess is that most if not all of the posts slagging this judge haven't read the decision. onenote Thursday #22

Less Money For Science, More Money For Clarence Thomas DrFunkenstein Thursday #23

So much for breach of contract iemanja Thursday #24

Yes, but you have to go to the right court. onenote Friday #31

Antiscience goons at play kyburbonkid Friday #25

"Did you read the opinion?" J_William_Ryan Friday #26

Yeap. Bout half. kyburbonkid Friday #27

How far do I have to dig Conjuay Friday #29

FakeNoose posted upthread BumRushDaShow Friday #32

Make cancer great again. Vinca Friday #30

Read one note's... GiqueCee Friday #33

Project 2025 dumbing down America for the fat orange imbecile wolfie001 Friday #34