Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: In new book, Kamala Harris says it was reckless to let Biden make reelection decision on his own [View all]24601
(4,110 posts)6. The Atlantic has a large excerpt from 107 Days. The link is provided.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2025/09/kamala-harris-107-days-excerpt/684150/
Here is the paragraph that may be drawing the most attention:
"And of all the people in the White House, I was in the worst position to make the case that he should drop out. I knew it would come off to him as incredibly self-serving if I advised him not to run. He would see it as naked ambition, perhaps as poisonous disloyalty, even if my only message was: Dont let the other guy win."
That truth doesn't have to be self-serving. True loyalty includes delivering the truth, even when it carries a great personal cost. It wouldn't have been if VPOTUS put the good of the nation ahead of her political ambitions.
For example:
"Mr. President and Mrs. Biden, it's time to step aside. If you don't, there is a real possibility that Trump will return to the presidency. In a perfect world, any Vice President would be honored to follow their President into the office. But that world doesn't exist. If you love the United States enough to withdraw from the race, I will not be a candidate. We have a good bench of talented Democrats who can mount a stronger race. I will wholeheartedly support our new candidate. More importantly, your legacy will not be another Trump administration. You will be remembered as the President who saved us and then wisely stood aside in favor of the next generation of leaders."
Here is the paragraph that may be drawing the most attention:
"And of all the people in the White House, I was in the worst position to make the case that he should drop out. I knew it would come off to him as incredibly self-serving if I advised him not to run. He would see it as naked ambition, perhaps as poisonous disloyalty, even if my only message was: Dont let the other guy win."
That truth doesn't have to be self-serving. True loyalty includes delivering the truth, even when it carries a great personal cost. It wouldn't have been if VPOTUS put the good of the nation ahead of her political ambitions.
For example:
"Mr. President and Mrs. Biden, it's time to step aside. If you don't, there is a real possibility that Trump will return to the presidency. In a perfect world, any Vice President would be honored to follow their President into the office. But that world doesn't exist. If you love the United States enough to withdraw from the race, I will not be a candidate. We have a good bench of talented Democrats who can mount a stronger race. I will wholeheartedly support our new candidate. More importantly, your legacy will not be another Trump administration. You will be remembered as the President who saved us and then wisely stood aside in favor of the next generation of leaders."
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
7 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
66 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

In new book, Kamala Harris says it was reckless to let Biden make reelection decision on his own [View all]
Jose Garcia
Sep 10
OP
Biden would have beaten Trump a second time. Giving up incumbency was not smart.
Blues Heron
Sep 10
#4
Now imagine if he stood in the race and there was a second debate that was similar to the first
Polybius
Sep 10
#62
'Biden Old & Demented' was 99% swiftboating/projectiom from the Trump campaign.
emulatorloo
Sep 10
#47
What I understand is that this is some sort of fantasmic wishful thinking.
ihaveaquestion
Sep 10
#45
Are you sure you want discussion of your comments? Doesn't seem like you can deal with it.
ihaveaquestion
Sep 10
#50
I can deal with what I posted just fine. I didn't address my comment to you, I owe you
Autumn
Sep 10
#54
It was his decision. We can't assume it was anyone else's and take away his agency.
ihaveaquestion
Sep 10
#22
Maybe ... however I still say that the US isn't ready for a black woman President
FakeNoose
Sep 10
#10
Clinton received nearly 3M more votes in 2016 than the NAZI that lords over the US and 2.1% more votes
Bengus81
Sep 10
#25
She had a lot of praise for Joe. The Dems lost. They weren't prepared. Let's stick together.
twodogsbarking
Sep 10
#13
Below, what I concluded also, plus the rest of that which you expressed...
sprinkleeninow
Sep 10
#39
I agree with you...maybe today's current events will take the attention away from her book
mtngirl47
Sep 10
#51
Couldn't Harris have rendered some kind of opinion to Biden back in June 2023?
Old Testament Libera
Sep 10
#58