Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The judge reportedly said that prosecutors failed to demonstrate any intent (of fraud) by the fake electors. Didn’t they willingly sign a document that they knew was fraudulent?
I suppose the argument is that they didn’t know it was fraudulent, because people were (on the basis of flimsy evidence that was in fact bullshit) maintaining that TSF had won the vote in our state. It’s really disappointing that the judge bought this line of rubbish.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
12 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read