Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

thesquanderer

(12,766 posts)

1. re: "questioned the rationale behind listing them publicly"

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Sep 9, 2025, 08:13 AM

Sep 9

That's a really interesting aspect. Why make it public? Just to flex their muscles in public to intimidate others?

Same with revoking secret service protections (and more dangerous to publicize).

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

House Intel Democrats launch probe into Trump revocation of security clearances [View all] BumRushDaShow Sep 9 OP

re: "questioned the rationale behind listing them publicly" thesquanderer Sep 9 #1

Tulsi was about to lose her job BumRushDaShow Sep 9 #2