Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(66,731 posts)
29. Re: Brett Kavanaugh: "We are approaching Plessy levels of obtuseness, or feigned obtuseness."
Mon Sep 8, 2025, 09:43 PM
Sep 8

Reposted by Mike Masnick
https://bsky.app/profile/mmasnick.bsky.social

Julian Sanchez
‪@normative.bsky.social‬
Among myriad problems with this ruling, can we pause to appreciate the childlike naïveté exhibited by Cavanaugh on the barely-worth-mentioning inconvenience of being detained and interogated by ICE? We are approaching Plessy levels of obtuseness, or feigned obtuseness.
Kavanaugh: Under this Court's precedents, not to mention common sense, those circumstances taken together can constitute at least reasonable suspicion of illegal presence in the United States. Importantly, reasonable suspicion means only that immigration officers may briefly stop the individual and inquire about immigration status. If the person is a U.S. citizen or otherwise lawfully in the United States, that individual will be free to go after the brief encounter. Only if the person is illegally in the United States may the stop lead to further immigration proceedings.
ALT
September 8, 2025 at 4:01 PM

Among myriad problems with this ruling, can we pause to appreciate the childlike naïveté exhibited by Cavanaugh on the barely-worth-mentioning inconvenience of being detained and interogated by ICE? We are approaching Plessy levels of obtuseness, or feigned obtuseness.

Julian Sanchez (@normative.bsky.social) 2025-09-08T20:01:45.536Z

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

They really have embraced the corrupting... WestMichRad Sep 8 #1
Truly don't understand angrychair Sep 8 #2
No Polybius Sep 8 #30
Respectfully disagree angrychair Sep 9 #31
'Reasonable suspicion' was the beginning back in the day. Cop cbabe Sep 8 #3
That means they can arrest any of us for whatever reason they want and detain us for whatever reason they want oldmanlynn Sep 8 #4
It's time to leave, just more packing to do vapor2 Sep 8 #5
How I wish I could. Dem2theMax Sep 8 #14
Supreme Scum Court NotHardly Sep 8 #6
6 racists to 3 that follow the rule of law Bayard Sep 8 #7
Not just the racism, Bohunk68 Sep 8 #27
The path forward is clear: Fiendish Thingy Sep 8 #8
+1. Expand the court, or live under Republican rule forever. dalton99a Sep 8 #16
You can tell the crooks, they are wearing robes. twodogsbarking Sep 8 #9
Well more than half the court Quanto Magnus Sep 8 #10
Deadline: Legal Blog--Supreme Court GOP majority grants Trump administration request for 'roving patrols' LetMyPeopleVote Sep 8 #11
Article title gets right to the point Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Sep 8 #12
No ambiguity there Cirsium Sep 8 #13
The Trump Supreme Whorehouse doesn't disappoint. dalton99a Sep 8 #15
Like another DUer said: Slavery will soon be Constitutional surfered Sep 8 #17
America needs to read the end of the story, very quickly. Buddyzbuddy Sep 8 #18
What if we contact the Supreme Court by postcard? annielion Sep 8 #19
When this mess is swept away (and someday it will be) Grokenstein Sep 8 #20
Time to march on the court. Grumpy Old Guy Sep 8 #21
The McConnell/Trump court strikes again. Scalded Nun Sep 8 #22
Guess I'm pumping up the Spanish music in my car! IzzaNuDay Sep 8 #23
Same shit different year DemUrLight Sep 8 #24
Mitch Abundance77 Sep 8 #25
So now ICE could detain 70% of the people who live here DBoon Sep 8 #26
The SCOUS backing out American Gestapo. republianmushroom Sep 8 #28
Re: Brett Kavanaugh: "We are approaching Plessy levels of obtuseness, or feigned obtuseness." mahatmakanejeeves Sep 8 #29
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court Embraces Ra...»Reply #29