Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(169,803 posts)
11. Deadline: Legal Blog--Supreme Court GOP majority grants Trump administration request for 'roving patrols'
Mon Sep 8, 2025, 01:16 PM
Sep 8

Democratic appointees in dissent said the move is “unconscionably irreconcilable with our Nation’s constitutional guarantees.”

Supreme Court GOP majority grants Trump administration request for ‘roving patrols’ Supreme Court GOP majority grants Trump administration request for ‘roving patrols’ www.msnbc.com/deadline-whi...

7Veritas4 (@justjonz.bsky.social) 2025-09-08T16:15:43.571Z

https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/supreme-court-los-angeles-roving-patrols-emergency-relief-trump-rcna224611

The Supreme Court’s Republican-appointed majority has granted the Trump administration’s emergency request to lift an order that temporarily restrained the government’s “roving patrols” in Los Angeles. A California judge had ruled that plaintiffs who sued the government, including U.S. citizens, would likely succeed in their claim that officials are conducting such patrols without reasonable suspicion.

The high court’s three Democratic appointees dissented from the unexplained majority order Monday, with Justice Sonia Sotomayor writing for the trio that the Fourth Amendment’s historical protections from arbitrary government interference “may no longer be true for those who happen to look a certain way, speak a certain way, and appear to work a certain type of legitimate job that pays very little.” She called the majority’s move “unconscionably irreconcilable with our Nation’s constitutional guarantees.”.....

Opposing emergency high court relief, the plaintiffs countered that the judge’s order “broke no new legal ground,” writing that it “does not prevent the government from enforcing the immigration laws, conducting consensual encounters, or relying on any or all of the four factors along with other facts to form reasonable suspicion.”

They further wrote that the administration’s “extraordinary claim that it can get very close to justifying a seizure of any Latino person in the Central District [of California] because of the asserted number of Latino people there who are not legally present is anathema to the Constitution.”

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

They really have embraced the corrupting... WestMichRad Sep 8 #1
Truly don't understand angrychair Sep 8 #2
No Polybius Sep 8 #30
Respectfully disagree angrychair Sep 9 #31
'Reasonable suspicion' was the beginning back in the day. Cop cbabe Sep 8 #3
That means they can arrest any of us for whatever reason they want and detain us for whatever reason they want oldmanlynn Sep 8 #4
It's time to leave, just more packing to do vapor2 Sep 8 #5
How I wish I could. Dem2theMax Sep 8 #14
Supreme Scum Court NotHardly Sep 8 #6
6 racists to 3 that follow the rule of law Bayard Sep 8 #7
Not just the racism, Bohunk68 Sep 8 #27
The path forward is clear: Fiendish Thingy Sep 8 #8
+1. Expand the court, or live under Republican rule forever. dalton99a Sep 8 #16
You can tell the crooks, they are wearing robes. twodogsbarking Sep 8 #9
Well more than half the court Quanto Magnus Sep 8 #10
Deadline: Legal Blog--Supreme Court GOP majority grants Trump administration request for 'roving patrols' LetMyPeopleVote Sep 8 #11
Article title gets right to the point Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Sep 8 #12
No ambiguity there Cirsium Sep 8 #13
The Trump Supreme Whorehouse doesn't disappoint. dalton99a Sep 8 #15
Like another DUer said: Slavery will soon be Constitutional surfered Sep 8 #17
America needs to read the end of the story, very quickly. Buddyzbuddy Sep 8 #18
What if we contact the Supreme Court by postcard? annielion Sep 8 #19
When this mess is swept away (and someday it will be) Grokenstein Sep 8 #20
Time to march on the court. Grumpy Old Guy Sep 8 #21
The McConnell/Trump court strikes again. Scalded Nun Sep 8 #22
Guess I'm pumping up the Spanish music in my car! IzzaNuDay Sep 8 #23
Same shit different year DemUrLight Sep 8 #24
Mitch Abundance77 Sep 8 #25
So now ICE could detain 70% of the people who live here DBoon Sep 8 #26
The SCOUS backing out American Gestapo. republianmushroom Sep 8 #28
Re: Brett Kavanaugh: "We are approaching Plessy levels of obtuseness, or feigned obtuseness." mahatmakanejeeves Sep 8 #29
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court Embraces Ra...»Reply #11