Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Supreme Court Embraces Racial Profiling By ICE In LA [View all]LetMyPeopleVote
(169,803 posts)11. Deadline: Legal Blog--Supreme Court GOP majority grants Trump administration request for 'roving patrols'
Democratic appointees in dissent said the move is unconscionably irreconcilable with our Nations constitutional guarantees.
Supreme Court GOP majority grants Trump administration request for âroving patrolsâ Supreme Court GOP majority grants Trump administration request for âroving patrolsâ www.msnbc.com/deadline-whi...
— 7Veritas4 (@justjonz.bsky.social) 2025-09-08T16:15:43.571Z
https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/supreme-court-los-angeles-roving-patrols-emergency-relief-trump-rcna224611
The Supreme Courts Republican-appointed majority has granted the Trump administrations emergency request to lift an order that temporarily restrained the governments roving patrols in Los Angeles. A California judge had ruled that plaintiffs who sued the government, including U.S. citizens, would likely succeed in their claim that officials are conducting such patrols without reasonable suspicion.
The high courts three Democratic appointees dissented from the unexplained majority order Monday, with Justice Sonia Sotomayor writing for the trio that the Fourth Amendments historical protections from arbitrary government interference may no longer be true for those who happen to look a certain way, speak a certain way, and appear to work a certain type of legitimate job that pays very little. She called the majoritys move unconscionably irreconcilable with our Nations constitutional guarantees......
Opposing emergency high court relief, the plaintiffs countered that the judges order broke no new legal ground, writing that it does not prevent the government from enforcing the immigration laws, conducting consensual encounters, or relying on any or all of the four factors along with other facts to form reasonable suspicion.
They further wrote that the administrations extraordinary claim that it can get very close to justifying a seizure of any Latino person in the Central District [of California] because of the asserted number of Latino people there who are not legally present is anathema to the Constitution.
The high courts three Democratic appointees dissented from the unexplained majority order Monday, with Justice Sonia Sotomayor writing for the trio that the Fourth Amendments historical protections from arbitrary government interference may no longer be true for those who happen to look a certain way, speak a certain way, and appear to work a certain type of legitimate job that pays very little. She called the majoritys move unconscionably irreconcilable with our Nations constitutional guarantees......
Opposing emergency high court relief, the plaintiffs countered that the judges order broke no new legal ground, writing that it does not prevent the government from enforcing the immigration laws, conducting consensual encounters, or relying on any or all of the four factors along with other facts to form reasonable suspicion.
They further wrote that the administrations extraordinary claim that it can get very close to justifying a seizure of any Latino person in the Central District [of California] because of the asserted number of Latino people there who are not legally present is anathema to the Constitution.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
31 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

That means they can arrest any of us for whatever reason they want and detain us for whatever reason they want
oldmanlynn
Sep 8
#4
Deadline: Legal Blog--Supreme Court GOP majority grants Trump administration request for 'roving patrols'
LetMyPeopleVote
Sep 8
#11
Re: Brett Kavanaugh: "We are approaching Plessy levels of obtuseness, or feigned obtuseness."
mahatmakanejeeves
Sep 8
#29