Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Alice B.

(617 posts)
5. I'm trying to remember the guest I was listening to on the radio yesterday who said he didn't need to be under oath...
Sat Sep 6, 2025, 02:18 PM
Sep 6

... necessarily, to get into trouble.

They cited 18 U.S. Code § 1001, I think (after googling whether it was possible to be held accountable for lying when not under oath).

This is the (god help me) AI overview:

"18 U.S.C. § 1001 is a federal statute that criminalizes knowingly and willfully making false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements, concealing facts, or using false documents in any matter within the jurisdiction of the U.S. government or Congress. Penalties for this offense include fines and/or imprisonment for up to five years. The law requires the act to be material, performed within federal jurisdiction, and done with a knowing and willful intent to deceive..."

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»RFK Jr. Given Green Light...»Reply #5