Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Silent Type

(11,058 posts)

2. I have no issue with non-competes for highly paid people as long as it's clear they are being paid extra not to

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Sat Sep 6, 2025, 11:55 AM

Sep 6

go elsewhere. And I get a medical practice, law firm, pro football team, big business, etc., trying to avoid getting screwed by an employee that moves to another organization without approval with clients and secrets. Plus, most of these noncompetes are within like 25 mile radius.

Absolutely opposed to non-competes for "regular" workers who aren't really being compensated not to go elsewhere.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump administration drops defense of ban on employee 'noncompete' agreements [View all] BumRushDaShow Sep 6 OP

Why shouldn't someone you no longer work for NOT have control over you? underpants Sep 6 #1

I have no issue with non-competes for highly paid people as long as it's clear they are being paid extra not to Silent Type Sep 6 #2