Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FBaggins

(28,433 posts)
19. No they didn't
Mon Sep 1, 2025, 02:44 PM
Sep 1

When SCOTUS allowed him to fire two members of the Labor board a few weeks ago they pointed out that the ruling did not mean that he could fire Powell just because he wasn't in line with executive policy preferences.

But that has little to nothing to do with whether or not he can fire a fed governor "for cause"... which is clearly allowable within the law that created the fed in the first place.

The question in this one almost certainly comes down to whether or not "cause" can include an accusation of a crime without charges (let alone conviction)... and whether or not she actually did what she is accused of.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Fed responds to Trump eff...»Reply #19