Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Marthe48

(21,833 posts)
15. Maybe rwnj will realize after all these bogus investigations
Wed Aug 27, 2025, 09:27 PM
Aug 27

that nothing they do is licit, popular, or meaningful. No amount of spinning, lying, erasing, will change the basic fact that rwnj are unlikable crooks.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The GQP once again fulfill their role as professional victims. groundloop Aug 27 #1
Well you hildegaard28 Aug 27 #2
This sounds like one of those accusations that is a confession. markodochartaigh Aug 27 #3
An edit is needed ... please forgive me. Botany Aug 27 #7
Bias Scarlet Begalas Aug 28 #28
Jesus.Fucking.CHRIST. 50 Shades Of Blue Aug 27 #4
It's as if they didn't control the whole government Klarkashton Aug 27 #5
Klarkashton Scarlet Begalas Aug 28 #29
When did the government get the power to regulate free speech on Wikipedia? bucolic_frolic Aug 27 #6
Good point jfz9580m Aug 28 #32
WTAF!! yardwork Aug 27 #8
"truth has a liberal bias" Skittles Aug 27 #9
They literally can't handle the truth. thought crime Aug 28 #25
I subscribe to the GAB mailing list (strictly for amusement!) JawJaw Aug 28 #31
Wikipedia articles have many authors bmichaelh Aug 27 #10
Wikipedia shows the weakness of not having one overriding editor who has final say - of course, you hope that top editor Midwestern Democrat Aug 29 #42
These people must be made out of fucking 200 year old glass or egg shells because these people chowder66 Aug 27 #11
If you want to see what conservatives would do to wikapedia ThoughtCriminal Aug 27 #12
Out of curiosity, I checked out Conservapedia occasionally in the past. Prof. Toru Tanaka Aug 27 #14
ThoughtCriminal Scarlet Begalas Aug 28 #30
It's a private enterprise. They can be as biased as they want. Vinca Aug 27 #13
Maybe rwnj will realize after all these bogus investigations Marthe48 Aug 27 #15
Unlikely. 8 investigations failed to convince them about Benghazi. nt Shipwack Aug 27 #17
The endless 'investigations' are only meant to cripple us. DC courts are nearly travelingthrulife Aug 28 #38
I was being snotty Marthe48 Aug 28 #40
This phrase makes little sense. Shipwack Aug 27 #16
I take it hildegaard28 Aug 28 #27
How about turning over that Fox News rock? Zorro Aug 27 #18
"Republicans investigate" Six117 Aug 27 #19
Facts don't care about your feelings. Fuck their party and the fascist horse it rode in on. Karasu Aug 27 #20
"Truth has a liberal bias" Jack Valentino Aug 27 #21
Yep. We all know as much, but their entire "anti-bias" crusade is just an attempt to rework all of reality to fit the Karasu Aug 27 #24
Some of us--- or rather most of THEM, but not US... Jack Valentino Aug 28 #41
If there is one thing Mace needs, it's organized bias, she only had 8 people show up for her rally. Uncle Joe Aug 27 #22
I hope the Wikipedia folks reply is .... mwooldri Aug 27 #23
They're playing to the base, and I mean base.(NT) The Wizard Aug 28 #26
Any bias I've seen on Wikipedia has generally been Republicans or dodgy business types covering up their own misdeeds muriel_volestrangler Aug 28 #33
The GOP excels at "projection". BumRushDaShow Aug 28 #34
They'll have a gaggle of Mar-a-Lardo ladies look over the website wolfie001 Aug 28 #35
Well, there goes that source. orangecrush Aug 28 #36
Comer needs to find a different hobby. emulatorloo Aug 28 #37
He should go back to farming. travelingthrulife Aug 28 #39
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Republicans investigate W...»Reply #15