Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Cracker Barrel loses almost $100 million in value as stock plunges after new logo release [View all]muriel_volestrangler
(104,739 posts)99. What happened in 2020?
'Eskimo' was complained about long before 2020.
Q: Does the word "Eskimos" really mean "eaters of raw flesh" in Cree?
A: Actually, the etymology of the word Eskimo is uncertain. Cree people today definitely associate the name with the Cree word askâwa, which does mean raw meat or eggs. One Cree speaker suggested the original word that became corrupted to Eskimo might have been askamiciw (which means "he eats it raw," ) and the Inuit are referred to in some Cree texts as askipiw (which means "eats something raw." )
On the other hand, some linguists have recently suggested that this might be a 'folk etymology'--an origin for a word which, though believed by many speakers of the language, isn't historically true. The Cree word askimew means "he laces snowshoes," and these linguists believe that may have been the original name the Crees used to refer to their Inuit neighbors.
Either of these theories is possible. In our own opinion, the biggest problem with the snowshoe theory is that lacing snowshoes was not a distinguishing trait of the Inuit--nearly every American Indian tribe in Canada used laced snowshoes, with the style of snowshoe varying from tribe to tribe. For the Cree to call the Inuit "snowshoe-lacers" would have been like the Germans calling the French "shoe-wearers." Why would they do that? Since the Inuit and Aleut did and still do eat some fish uncooked, which the Cree do not, that would have been a much more sensible name (and not necessarily an insulting one, at least originally.) On the other hand, English corruptions of Native American names are often much abbreviated ("Sioux" comes from the last two syllables of the Ojibway name Naadawesiwag, for example,) so it's certainly possible that the original name could have meant "he makes circular snowshoes" or something else meaningfully descriptive.
In any event, regardless of the name's origins, many Inuit people do not like the word "Eskimo" today. "Eskimo" has often been used in a racist or demeaning way over the years, so although some communities do continue to use the word, others prefer to be called by their native name for themselves, Inuit.
https://alutiiqmuseum.org/collection/Detail/word/414
A: Actually, the etymology of the word Eskimo is uncertain. Cree people today definitely associate the name with the Cree word askâwa, which does mean raw meat or eggs. One Cree speaker suggested the original word that became corrupted to Eskimo might have been askamiciw (which means "he eats it raw," ) and the Inuit are referred to in some Cree texts as askipiw (which means "eats something raw." )
On the other hand, some linguists have recently suggested that this might be a 'folk etymology'--an origin for a word which, though believed by many speakers of the language, isn't historically true. The Cree word askimew means "he laces snowshoes," and these linguists believe that may have been the original name the Crees used to refer to their Inuit neighbors.
Either of these theories is possible. In our own opinion, the biggest problem with the snowshoe theory is that lacing snowshoes was not a distinguishing trait of the Inuit--nearly every American Indian tribe in Canada used laced snowshoes, with the style of snowshoe varying from tribe to tribe. For the Cree to call the Inuit "snowshoe-lacers" would have been like the Germans calling the French "shoe-wearers." Why would they do that? Since the Inuit and Aleut did and still do eat some fish uncooked, which the Cree do not, that would have been a much more sensible name (and not necessarily an insulting one, at least originally.) On the other hand, English corruptions of Native American names are often much abbreviated ("Sioux" comes from the last two syllables of the Ojibway name Naadawesiwag, for example,) so it's certainly possible that the original name could have meant "he makes circular snowshoes" or something else meaningfully descriptive.
In any event, regardless of the name's origins, many Inuit people do not like the word "Eskimo" today. "Eskimo" has often been used in a racist or demeaning way over the years, so although some communities do continue to use the word, others prefer to be called by their native name for themselves, Inuit.
https://alutiiqmuseum.org/collection/Detail/word/414
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
118 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Cracker Barrel loses almost $100 million in value as stock plunges after new logo release [View all]
Polybius
Aug 22
OP
Second most hated marketing department after Sirius Cybernetics Corporation's nt
Xipe Totec
Aug 22
#44
Or the decision was made after conducting focus groups comprised of Gen Z's and Millennials
Auggie
Aug 22
#6
And lowered the pitcher's mound by an inch or so. That is to allow more home runs.
3Hotdogs
Aug 22
#16
I've not heard about this, and can't find any verification online. Do you have a link?
TheRickles
Aug 22
#19
Yes, I knew about the 1969 change. Your post sounded like another, more recent change had been instituted.
TheRickles
Aug 22
#35
Doing many things to speed up the game. Only so many throws to first by the pitcher are allowed
Bengus81
Aug 23
#74
No, the screw-up was overestimating the intelligence and emotional maturity of their customers.
Paladin
Aug 22
#8
I should have been more clear, as I was referring to certain products and businesses
Polybius
Aug 23
#91
I've never eaten at Cracker Barrel, but if I was a customer, the new logo would not change my attitude.
LeftInTX
Aug 23
#89
Exactly. Cracker Barrel's logo change became the most recent exmple of "evil wokeism" for right-wingers.
sop
Aug 23
#73
Disney came under lots of criticism when they changed their Aunt Jemima pancake house in Disneyland.
ificandream
Aug 24
#116
One thing that we took comfort in when my MIL passed away--no more visits to Cracker Barrel
Maeve
Aug 22
#14
I can't understand why anyone rational is "upset" about a minor change in the logo of a cheap restaurant
muriel_volestrangler
Aug 23
#75
I love the new logo. To me, it looks like "woke" and "DEI" rolled into one image.
JustABozoOnThisBus
Aug 22
#27
Awesome strategy ... 10 more one-percenters just sold their stock in Cracker Barrel
FakeNoose
Aug 22
#29
What kind of idiot eats at a restuarant because of their logo? Or doesn't eat at a restuarant because of their logo?
Ferrets are Cool
Aug 22
#33
it ain't broke, just increasingly old and obsolete, the new logo is just bland not woke
pstokely
Aug 23
#115
I like Cracker Barrel food and their prices are reasonable. They have some things you don't see other places
doc03
Aug 23
#79
Just knowing I would never run into James Woods would be an incentive to eat there.
Greybnk48
Aug 23
#94
if someone is going to botcott cracker barrell over new logo they are an idiot
moonshinegnomie
Aug 23
#110