Another N.Y. judge previously rejected unsealing Ghislaine Maxwells transcripts. A third rejected unsealing the Epstein transcripts in Florida.
Another judge denies the DOJâs effort to unseal Epstein-related grand jury transcripts www.msnbc.com/deadline-whi...
— (@dee-denem.bsky.social) 2025-08-20T18:00:52.372Z
https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/jeffrey-epstein-grand-jury-transcripts-unsealed-ruling-rcna224551
A federal judge on Wednesday denied the Trump Justice Departments motion to unseal grand jury transcripts in Jeffrey Epsteins New York sex trafficking case, dealing the DOJ its latest loss on the subject, in a ruling that spotlights the governments bumbling legal effort and lack of transparency in the Epstein scandal.
The ruling from U.S. District Judge Richard Berman follows an Aug. 11 decision from another judge in New York that rejected the DOJs motion to unseal transcripts in the case of convicted Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell, as well as a July ruling from a judge in Florida rejecting DOJs Epstein-related unsealing effort in that state.
Ruling against the DOJ in the Maxwell case, U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer wrote that [a] member of the public, appreciating that the Maxwell grand jury materials do not contribute anything to public knowledge, might conclude that the Governments motion for their unsealing was aimed not at transparency but at diversion aimed not at full disclosure but at the illusion of such.
Similarly rejecting the effort in Epsteins case specifically, Berman wrote Wednesday that the unsealing motion appeared to be a diversion from the full scope of Epstein-related files in the governments possession. He wrote that the grand jury testimony is just a hearsay snippet of Epsteins alleged conduct, and that the information in the Epstein grand jury transcripts pales in comparison with the information in the DOJs hands. He also criticized the government for not properly notifying victims before filing the motion.