Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(168,872 posts)
2. Deadline: Legal Blog-Another judge denies the DOJ's effort to unseal Epstein-related grand jury transcripts
Wed Aug 20, 2025, 02:32 PM
Aug 20

Another N.Y. judge previously rejected unsealing Ghislaine Maxwell’s transcripts. A third rejected unsealing the Epstein transcripts in Florida.

Another judge denies the DOJ’s effort to unseal Epstein-related grand jury transcripts www.msnbc.com/deadline-whi...

(@dee-denem.bsky.social) 2025-08-20T18:00:52.372Z

https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/jeffrey-epstein-grand-jury-transcripts-unsealed-ruling-rcna224551

A federal judge on Wednesday denied the Trump Justice Department’s motion to unseal grand jury transcripts in Jeffrey Epstein’s New York sex trafficking case, dealing the DOJ its latest loss on the subject, in a ruling that spotlights the government’s bumbling legal effort and lack of transparency in the Epstein scandal.

The ruling from U.S. District Judge Richard Berman follows an Aug. 11 decision from another judge in New York that rejected the DOJ’s motion to unseal transcripts in the case of convicted Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell, as well as a July ruling from a judge in Florida rejecting DOJ’s Epstein-related unsealing effort in that state.

Ruling against the DOJ in the Maxwell case, U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer wrote that “[a] member of the public, appreciating that the Maxwell grand jury materials do not contribute anything to public knowledge, might conclude that the Government’s motion for their unsealing was aimed not at ‘transparency’ but at diversion — aimed not at full disclosure but at the illusion of such.”

Similarly rejecting the effort in Epstein’s case specifically, Berman wrote Wednesday that the unsealing motion appeared to be a diversion from the full scope of Epstein-related files in the government’s possession. He wrote that the grand jury testimony is just a “hearsay snippet” of Epstein’s alleged conduct, and that the information in the Epstein grand jury transcripts “pales in comparison” with the information in the DOJ’s hands. He also criticized the government for not properly notifying victims before filing the motion.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge declines to unseal ...»Reply #2