Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

SWBTATTReg

(25,701 posts)

6. She is. I love the way you described her, in one short sentence, in seven words. Simple, to the point, and precise.

Reply to Initech (Reply #1)

Tue Aug 12, 2025, 01:13 PM

Aug 12

I always wondered how one person alone can decide that, they alone have God's blessings to prevent others from joyful marriage/unions. I suppose that she would still oppose mixed marriages, ethic marriages, etc. too. Some people are just so hateful, so spiteful, so inhuman, to not just the two seeking marriage, but also to their families, their kids, etc.

Didn't the bible state be compassionate? I guess being hateful in this manner is somehow allowed. I just hope one day, that true justice will come and burn her in a manner that she'll realize then how wrong she is.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

electric_blue68 NEOH Boomerproud MrsCheaplaugh

20 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court formally asked to overturn landmark same-sex marriage ruling [View all] groundloop Aug 12 OP

Kim Davis needs to be thrown in the dumpster and forgotten about. What a miserable POS that woman is. Initech Aug 12 #1

She is. I love the way you described her, in one short sentence, in seven words. Simple, to the point, and precise. SWBTATTReg Aug 12 #6

So well stated. TY! electric_blue68 Aug 12 #9

I don't understand how these Supremes can keep overturning former Supreme's rulings Bayard Aug 12 #2

Because they can. North Coast Lawyer Aug 12 #8

Ohhh, so THAT'S what -Marbury v. Madison- is about. (Not a lawyer) electric_blue68 Aug 12 #10

Marbury v. Madison is consistent with the Constitution's Article III, Specifically, "The judicial Power shall extend to 24601 Aug 12 #12

Two Edged Sword North Coast Lawyer Aug 12 #13

Marbury was required. Igel Aug 12 #16

Like Now? North Coast Lawyer Aug 13 #18

Lots of precedents were overturned. Igel Aug 12 #15

Religious extremism ZDU Aug 12 #3

But it's okay for drumpf to want to screw his daughter. greatauntoftriplets Aug 12 #4

A PANDORA'S BOX Jimvanhise Aug 12 #5

'Davis is seen as one of the only Americans Oeditpus Rex Aug 12 #7

Mind your own fucking business, Karen. LudwigPastorius Aug 12 #11

If the SC fucks this up, bluestarone Aug 12 #14

6-3. Count on it. Boomerproud Aug 13 #17

I'm gonna kill people who do fornication, uncleanness, passion, evil desire,,,,just for fun. chouchou Aug 13 #19

There's enough love in the world for you too, Karen. mahina Aug 14 #20