Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Jimvanhise

(508 posts)

5. A PANDORA'S BOX

Reply to groundloop (Original post)

Tue Aug 12, 2025, 12:40 PM

Aug 12

In the 1960s the Supreme Court ruled that religious beliefs could not be used to justify racism and refusing to give equal rights to blacks. The Mormon church once claimed that they could discriminate against blacks because being black was the mark of Cain as described in the Bible. The Supreme Court said no. Religion could not be used to justify discrimination. In the 1960s universities were established for whites only, based on religious beliefs. Those were deemed illegal discrimination. This is what the Supreme Court could open up if religion is accepted to justify discrimination. Whites only schools. Whites only businesses. I'm amazed they agreed to hear this case.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

kcoates booksenkatz electric_blue68 valleyrogue

20 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court formally asked to overturn landmark same-sex marriage ruling [View all] groundloop Aug 12 OP

Kim Davis needs to be thrown in the dumpster and forgotten about. What a miserable POS that woman is. Initech Aug 12 #1

She is. I love the way you described her, in one short sentence, in seven words. Simple, to the point, and precise. SWBTATTReg Aug 12 #6

So well stated. TY! electric_blue68 Aug 12 #9

I don't understand how these Supremes can keep overturning former Supreme's rulings Bayard Aug 12 #2

Because they can. North Coast Lawyer Aug 12 #8

Ohhh, so THAT'S what -Marbury v. Madison- is about. (Not a lawyer) electric_blue68 Aug 12 #10

Marbury v. Madison is consistent with the Constitution's Article III, Specifically, "The judicial Power shall extend to 24601 Aug 12 #12

Two Edged Sword North Coast Lawyer Aug 12 #13

Marbury was required. Igel Aug 12 #16

Like Now? North Coast Lawyer Aug 13 #18

Lots of precedents were overturned. Igel Aug 12 #15

Religious extremism ZDU Aug 12 #3

But it's okay for drumpf to want to screw his daughter. greatauntoftriplets Aug 12 #4

A PANDORA'S BOX Jimvanhise Aug 12 #5

'Davis is seen as one of the only Americans Oeditpus Rex Aug 12 #7

Mind your own fucking business, Karen. LudwigPastorius Aug 12 #11

If the SC fucks this up, bluestarone Aug 12 #14

6-3. Count on it. Boomerproud Aug 13 #17

I'm gonna kill people who do fornication, uncleanness, passion, evil desire,,,,just for fun. chouchou Aug 13 #19

There's enough love in the world for you too, Karen. mahina Aug 14 #20