Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cab67

(3,480 posts)
10. It's not as low on the spectrum as you think.
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 02:17 PM
Aug 5

Not in my fields, at any rate.

And there is a credentialed peer-reviewing profession. You can find it at every university, research center, museum, or any other facility that hires professional scientists. I take the system very seriously, as does every professional scientist I've ever encountered.

Peer review is a flawed process, but the issue raised by this article actually has nothing to do with peer review at all. These predatory journals don't really use peer review - if you pay the requested fees, the journal will publish whatever shit they're given. Pay to play. The vast majority of these fraudulent "studies" would never survive peer review. The problem is thus not peer review, but the existence of "journals" that mimic peer-reviewed publications.

And I stand by what I said - in spite of its flaws, there is no alternative.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Scientific Journals Can't...»Reply #10