Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(160,177 posts)
21. There still might be wiggle room disallowing that
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 09:20 AM
Aug 5
Amendment XXII
Section 1.


No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once. But this article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President when this article was proposed by the Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term.

(snip)

https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/amendmentxxii


So he might not be eligible to be nominated for VP and then suddenly ascend.

The issue they seem to want to argue is the allowance for more than 2 terms if the previous terms were "non-consecutive" single terms. I.e., in contrast to the very first part of the first sentence, which should be considered "clear cut". The only "except" was basically referring to Truman, who was in office at the time of ratification.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

if krasnov is alive in 2028 .... rampartd Aug 4 #1
I think that only applied if the name removal BumRushDaShow Aug 4 #3
Futurama is what immediately passed through my mind Alice B. Aug 4 #16
How do five House seats do that? FBaggins Aug 4 #2
Just like he's ignoring the 4th Amendment and the 14th Amendment BumRushDaShow Aug 4 #5
Has this concept been tried before? CTyankee Aug 5 #18
The 22nd Amendment BumRushDaShow Aug 5 #19
He doesn't even need to violate any amendments Shrek Aug 5 #20
There still might be wiggle room disallowing that BumRushDaShow Aug 5 #21
The text "shall be elected" is operative Shrek Aug 5 #22
He is not going to do three terms Beto. His health won't let him. He just wants to grift Bengus81 Aug 4 #4
Ha. That is not how this works Hornedfrog2000 Aug 4 #12
'This is our last best chance to stand and fight': Beto O'Rourke on Texas' redistricting plan - The Weekend Primetime Rhiannon12866 Aug 4 #6
Very disappointed Beto would engage in this idiotic conspiracy mongering. Wiz Imp Aug 4 #7
We can only hope Bluestocking Aug 4 #8
Which is when the real trouble will begin! (n/t) OldBaldy1701E Aug 4 #9
Based on what??? Hornedfrog2000 Aug 4 #13
This is just the opinion of one person but you can find lots of others online Wiz Imp Aug 4 #14
In theory, maybe. A good scare-tactic to get people motivated. But in reality, he won't finish this term. Oopsie Daisy Aug 4 #10
How about we cut to the chase Hornedfrog2000 Aug 4 #11
"...Democrats should aim to redraw districts..." SpankMe Aug 4 #15
DIck Trucy gonna last to 2029 Jan 21st and is there anywhere legally to bet on it?? Brainfodder Aug 4 #17
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Beto O'Rourke Says Third ...»Reply #21