Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bucolic_frolic

(52,783 posts)
31. Time to dust one off the shelves
Tue Sep 24, 2019, 10:35 AM
Sep 2019

and make it mean what it originally meant in 1857

Contempt of Congress is the act of obstructing the work of the United States Congress or one of its committees. Historically, the bribery of a U.S. Senator or U.S. Representative was considered contempt of Congress. In modern times, contempt of Congress has generally applied to the refusal to comply with a subpoena issued by a Congressional committee or subcommittee—usually seeking to compel either testimony or the production of requested documents.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contempt_of_Congress

As for high crimes and misdemeanors, try dereliction of duty, abuse of authority, misuse of assets (taxpayers pay a lot to keep Congress in session, it should do something other than kowtow to Moscow Mitch)

The charge of high crimes and misdemeanors covers allegations of misconduct by officials, such as perjury of oath, abuse of authority, bribery, intimidation, misuse of assets, failure to supervise, dereliction of duty, unbecoming conduct, refusal to obey a lawful order, chronic intoxication, and tax evasion. Offenses by officials also include ordinary crimes, but perhaps with different standards of proof and punishment than for nonofficials, on the grounds that more is expected of officials by their oaths of office.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_crimes_and_misdemeanors

Never believe what you are told by so-called self-appointed experts. They are conventional wisdom in concrete.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Suspending Parliament was unlawful, court rules [View all] muriel_volestrangler Sep 2019 OP
WaPo has a story BumRushDaShow Sep 2019 #1
Hale says prorogation 'unlawful, void and of no effect' canetoad Sep 2019 #2
Good morning and good evening! BumRushDaShow Sep 2019 #4
I want Lady Hale's spider brooch Arazi Sep 2019 #14
NYT link BumRushDaShow Sep 2019 #3
Good! LittleGirl Sep 2019 #5
Wonder if Bercow is going to rescind his resignation BumRushDaShow Sep 2019 #6
his successor hasn't been decided yet muriel_volestrangler Sep 2019 #9
Okay thanks! BumRushDaShow Sep 2019 #13
Harriet Harman has put her name forward, as have others muriel_volestrangler Sep 2019 #19
Man, this season's writers are really pulling out all the stops (nt) Recursion Sep 2019 #7
It's unanimous... BooScout Sep 2019 #8
Cockmuppets protest the comparison to Boris Johnson. yellowcanine Sep 2019 #22
He lied to the queen?!? BigmanPigman Sep 2019 #10
Yeah, that was already legally established. malthaussen Sep 2019 #35
Gee. I wish we had a Supreme Court. 3Hotdogs Sep 2019 #11
And a Republican Party with even one shred of decency and belief in the rule of law. Lonestarblue Sep 2019 #23
Parliament will reconvene tomorrow at 11.30am. n/t Denzil_DC Sep 2019 #12
Now it's just bets on when BoJo resigns Arazi Sep 2019 #15
He said earlier that he wouldn't feel obliged to resign and he may even try again. Eugene Sep 2019 #16
That's it, Boorish! Keep digging! Grokenstein Sep 2019 #18
then the PMs will have no choice but to do a vote of no confidence to kick Borish Boris out onetexan Sep 2019 #32
UPDATE: Brexit: Bercow says parliament will sit tomorrow after judges rule prorogation unlawful brooklynite Sep 2019 #17
They need to do a no confidence vote now. yellowcanine Sep 2019 #20
The Opposition needs to play this carefully. Denzil_DC Sep 2019 #25
A link to Parliament TV Mike 03 Sep 2019 #21
De Pfeffel-Johnson still intends to break the law and Brexit Ghost Dog Sep 2019 #24
Moscow Mitch has been STYMIEING Congress since February 2016! bucolic_frolic Sep 2019 #26
Because it doesn't exist. DetroitLegalBeagle Sep 2019 #29
Time to dust one off the shelves bucolic_frolic Sep 2019 #31
What if the US had a woman chief justice Supreme Court? dlk Sep 2019 #27
Bye bye Boris Fiendish Thingy Sep 2019 #28
One does not lie to the queen C_U_L8R Sep 2019 #30
Borish Boris is hellbent on a no-deal Brexit. Parliament must oust him and Labour must win to force onetexan Sep 2019 #33
I'm impressed. malthaussen Sep 2019 #34
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Suspending Parliament was...»Reply #31