Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Suspending Parliament was unlawful, court rules [View all]BumRushDaShow
(161,713 posts)3. NYT link
Boris Johnsons Suspension of Parliament Was Unlawful, U.K. Supreme Court Rules

By Mark Landler
Sept. 24, 2019, 5:46 a.m. ET
LONDON The British Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday that Prime Minister Boris Johnson illegally suspended Parliament, dealing him another heavy blow and thrusting the nations politics into even deeper turmoil, barely a month before it is scheduled to leave the European Union. The decision, which upheld a ruling from Scotlands highest civil court, reopens a debate over Brexit that was short-circuited when Mr. Johnson asked the queen to suspend, or prorogue, Parliament for five weeks.
Though it has historically avoided politics, the court made a landmark decision to intervene in a fierce clash between Mr. Johnson and Parliament over when and how to exit the European Union. The court essentially endorsed the judgment of the Scottish court that Mr. Johnsons suspension was an effort to stymie debate before an Oct. 31 withdrawal deadline, which he had pledged to meet even if Britain and Brussels did not reach an agreement on the terms.
As a practical matter, it was not clear how much the decision would change the governments immediate approach to Brexit. In the days before they were dispersed, members of the House of Commons pushed through a law over the prime ministers fierce opposition that would prohibit Mr. Johnson from pursuing a no-deal Brexit.
But in symbolic terms, the court ruling was a stinging rebuke for the prime minister. It raised the question of whether he had misled Queen Elizabeth II in asking her to prorogue the Parliament. And it added to the perception that his Conservative government was running roughshod over Britains most hallowed political conventions in its zeal to extract the country from Europe.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/24/world/europe/uk-supreme-court-brexit.html

By Mark Landler
Sept. 24, 2019, 5:46 a.m. ET
LONDON The British Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday that Prime Minister Boris Johnson illegally suspended Parliament, dealing him another heavy blow and thrusting the nations politics into even deeper turmoil, barely a month before it is scheduled to leave the European Union. The decision, which upheld a ruling from Scotlands highest civil court, reopens a debate over Brexit that was short-circuited when Mr. Johnson asked the queen to suspend, or prorogue, Parliament for five weeks.
Though it has historically avoided politics, the court made a landmark decision to intervene in a fierce clash between Mr. Johnson and Parliament over when and how to exit the European Union. The court essentially endorsed the judgment of the Scottish court that Mr. Johnsons suspension was an effort to stymie debate before an Oct. 31 withdrawal deadline, which he had pledged to meet even if Britain and Brussels did not reach an agreement on the terms.
As a practical matter, it was not clear how much the decision would change the governments immediate approach to Brexit. In the days before they were dispersed, members of the House of Commons pushed through a law over the prime ministers fierce opposition that would prohibit Mr. Johnson from pursuing a no-deal Brexit.
But in symbolic terms, the court ruling was a stinging rebuke for the prime minister. It raised the question of whether he had misled Queen Elizabeth II in asking her to prorogue the Parliament. And it added to the perception that his Conservative government was running roughshod over Britains most hallowed political conventions in its zeal to extract the country from Europe.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/24/world/europe/uk-supreme-court-brexit.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
35 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

And a Republican Party with even one shred of decency and belief in the rule of law.
Lonestarblue
Sep 2019
#23
He said earlier that he wouldn't feel obliged to resign and he may even try again.
Eugene
Sep 2019
#16
then the PMs will have no choice but to do a vote of no confidence to kick Borish Boris out
onetexan
Sep 2019
#32
UPDATE: Brexit: Bercow says parliament will sit tomorrow after judges rule prorogation unlawful
brooklynite
Sep 2019
#17