Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Dear Democrats: Nobody Cares About Your Feelings [View all]
Dear Democrats: Nobody Cares About Your Feelings
Conservatives are much more clear-eyedand thats why they win so often
By Cliston Brown 01/16/17 8:00am
Democrats have lost three of the last four federal elections2010, 2014 and 2016in large part because they are still clinging to the comforting but false notion that voters punish bad behavior.
The Democrats 2016 presidential campaign essentially focused on proving Donald Trump was too boorish to be an acceptable occupant of the highest office in the land. And in the lead-up to the 2010 and 2014 midterms, Democrats railed against Congressional Republicans obstruction of President Obama, decrying the GOPs refusal to give the administration any cooperation, even on issues where pollsters showed high levels of support from the public. Their complaints failed, and Republicans won.
More than two months after the stunning defeat of Hillary Clinton, there seems to be no evidence that Democrats have learned anything. They continue to harp on whatever makes Trump look unpresidential, and while there is unquestionably plenty of material there, it is also clear that there arent enough voters who care about such things to swing an election. If there were, Trump would not have prevailed.
Clinton won the popular vote, and she won it decisively, by nearly three million ballots. That brings us to another thing Democrats havent learned, but need to soon: the necessity of focusing on whats important. In terms of winning and losing, its irrelevant that Clinton won the popular vote. Whether you like our unfair, undemocratic electoral college system or not (for the record, this columnist doesnt), were stuck with it unless we change the Constitution or enough states band together to create a work-around. Its fine that Clinton won by eight million votes in California, but strategically speaking, it would have been far more important for Democrats to turn out another 80,000 votes in Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin. If you cant change the rules, you have to figure out how to win by the current ones.
Snip>>>>>>>>>
The Tea Party movement that started early in Obamas first term has been decried by the left for its positions and tactics, but the Tea Party undisputedly understood power. It organized, took down hundreds of incumbents at all levels of government, and it became a powerful force that establishment Republicans were afraid to cross for fear of being challenged at the primary level.
Progressives need to take a lesson from the Tea Party if they want to advance their own agenda. Merely being loud and visible isnt going to cut it. They have to organize, and they have to vote in every election: presidential, midterm, primary, and special. Only when they demonstrate a credible threat to politicians jobs will they get what they want. Winning, not whining, is what creates change.
http://observer.com/2017/01/democrats-need-to-learn-how-to-win-elections/
Conservatives are much more clear-eyedand thats why they win so often
By Cliston Brown 01/16/17 8:00am
Democrats have lost three of the last four federal elections2010, 2014 and 2016in large part because they are still clinging to the comforting but false notion that voters punish bad behavior.
The Democrats 2016 presidential campaign essentially focused on proving Donald Trump was too boorish to be an acceptable occupant of the highest office in the land. And in the lead-up to the 2010 and 2014 midterms, Democrats railed against Congressional Republicans obstruction of President Obama, decrying the GOPs refusal to give the administration any cooperation, even on issues where pollsters showed high levels of support from the public. Their complaints failed, and Republicans won.
More than two months after the stunning defeat of Hillary Clinton, there seems to be no evidence that Democrats have learned anything. They continue to harp on whatever makes Trump look unpresidential, and while there is unquestionably plenty of material there, it is also clear that there arent enough voters who care about such things to swing an election. If there were, Trump would not have prevailed.
Clinton won the popular vote, and she won it decisively, by nearly three million ballots. That brings us to another thing Democrats havent learned, but need to soon: the necessity of focusing on whats important. In terms of winning and losing, its irrelevant that Clinton won the popular vote. Whether you like our unfair, undemocratic electoral college system or not (for the record, this columnist doesnt), were stuck with it unless we change the Constitution or enough states band together to create a work-around. Its fine that Clinton won by eight million votes in California, but strategically speaking, it would have been far more important for Democrats to turn out another 80,000 votes in Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin. If you cant change the rules, you have to figure out how to win by the current ones.
Snip>>>>>>>>>
The Tea Party movement that started early in Obamas first term has been decried by the left for its positions and tactics, but the Tea Party undisputedly understood power. It organized, took down hundreds of incumbents at all levels of government, and it became a powerful force that establishment Republicans were afraid to cross for fear of being challenged at the primary level.
Progressives need to take a lesson from the Tea Party if they want to advance their own agenda. Merely being loud and visible isnt going to cut it. They have to organize, and they have to vote in every election: presidential, midterm, primary, and special. Only when they demonstrate a credible threat to politicians jobs will they get what they want. Winning, not whining, is what creates change.
http://observer.com/2017/01/democrats-need-to-learn-how-to-win-elections/
Cliston Brown is a communications executive and political analyst in the San Francisco Bay Area who previously served as director of communications to a longtime Democratic Representative in Washington, D.C. Follow him on Twitter (@ClistonBrown) and visit his website at ClistonBrown.com.
I thought this was a good article although I don't think we are whining if we call out Trump and his minions for their hypocrisy. Yes we went through a period of disbelief and major disappointment, but all I hear now is how do we turn this around instead of in-fighting.
Republicans band together for their greater good. The Tea Party was disruptive to the Republican Party, but in the end they joined forces and presented a somewhat unified front. Rand Paul and Ted Cruz may have been the exception, but on the larger issues they acted as one, to oppose Obama every inch of the way and they worked together to build up their grass roots and dominate in local and state elections. Liberals/Progressives continue to fight for their individual pet issues, instead of uniting to beat back the RW hoard.
52 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Will read whole thing later, but I must add that FOX News and Breitbart make a reality
KittyWampus
Jan 2017
#1
Have a CLEAR, STRONG, COMPELLING message on JOBS JOBS JOBS that people want to vote for.
RBInMaine
Jan 2017
#19
If that's the Dem party's official strategy, then this country is finished.
Crunchy Frog
Jan 2017
#39
"Then what about the voters who couldn't/wouldn't vote for Hillary because of..."
EL34x4
Jan 2017
#33
Exactly!!! "Liberals/Progressives continue to fight for their individual pet issues, instead of
RKP5637
Jan 2017
#2
Plus he does not talk about voter suppression or unverifiable voting machines that can be
kimbutgar
Jan 2017
#8
Yes, but it took years for them to get the power to cheat and part of this was about participation
Dream Girl
Jan 2017
#28
+1, I'm super sick of these articles leaving out the overt cheating of the GOP in the form of voter
uponit7771
Jan 2017
#27
They win because they speak CLEARLY, they ORGANIZE, and they SHOW UP! Enough WHINING!!!
RBInMaine
Jan 2017
#17
Democrats need a compelling affirmative message, need to get CLEAR, and get STRONG. Period!
RBInMaine
Jan 2017
#18
It comes across as a very flat assessment of what's going on in today's politics
SticksnStones
Jan 2017
#30
I've been saying this since the election: the republicans win because they own the media.
Initech
Jan 2017
#46
Well, that and having a Horatio Alger-addicted American population doesn't hurt.
HughBeaumont
Jan 2017
#48