Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Neil deGrasse Tyson has settled it once and for all .....Which came first the Chicken or the Egg? [View all]mathematic
(1,594 posts)20. That's not the definition of chicken or species
Both terms are defined by scientific consensus. Many people involved in the consensus use the reproduction rule. However, this rule is clearly inadequate as there are many examples of different species successfully producing fertile offspring.
Additionally, the chicken-or-egg problem predates the theory of evolution by two millennia, dating back to Aristotle (who liked to write about the causes of things). Back then it was more related to a "what created the Creator?" type of problem.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Neil deGrasse Tyson has settled it once and for all .....Which came first the Chicken or the Egg? [View all]
Playinghardball
Aug 2014
OP
Looks to me like you are backing up his theory. If a chicken evolved from something
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#13
So you're saying there could be several generations of "almost chicken" between chicken
tclambert
Aug 2014
#48
The Creator must have created him/her/itself. Which implies the Creator is a time traveler.
tclambert
Aug 2014
#46