Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

underpants

(197,974 posts)
1. Great read. More from the article
Thu Jul 2, 2026, 11:34 AM
Thursday

C.J. Bartunek, writing in the Oxford American in June 2023, documented what the mountaintop looked like a year after the article. Visitors now arrived in pairs with scripted questions; one would loudly ask something provocative about slavery and states’ rights, while the other recorded. Bill Barker described the pattern: “They’re always white men.” When a volunteer asked one man to stop filming, he left in a huff but was soon spotted hiding behind the sugar maple, phone pointed at the presentation. Metal detectors and bag checks had been added to the front entrance. Pocket knives were confiscated and stored in what one volunteer whimsically called the “knife hotel.” Nasty reviews, Bartunek confirmed, appeared on Tripadvisor “echoing the media commentators”—not the language of people who had visited and been disappointed, but the language of people who had watched a Fox News segment and felt deputized.

The sequencing is: Monticello, July 9; Montpelier, July 16; Heritage, July 27. That is a coordinated escalation from tabloid journalism to policy infrastructure, not a journalistic coincidence.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

What Broke Monticello by Bridget Gillespie [View all] justaprogressive Thursday OP
Great read. More from the article underpants Thursday #1
kick Celerity Friday #2
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What Broke Monticello by ...»Reply #1