General Discussion

SSJVegeta

(3,447 posts)

34. The undersranding used to be because it would be counted and also because things change dramatically (esp in primaries)

Reply to MichMan (Reply #32)

Mon Jun 29, 2026, 11:56 AM

Monday

Before election day. But in general elections quite frankly, people need to turn that thing in as soon as they get it. And also theres a good chance the government will do everything they can to not count our votes so sooner is always better no matter what at this point.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

60 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

SCOTUS holds states can count late-arriving mail-in ballots that are postmarked on or before Election Day [View all] In It to Win It Monday OP

Good Aviation Pro Monday #1

WOW... Hate to say it ordinarily, but thank you Amy Coney Barrett hlthe2b Monday #2

Amy Barrett has had a couple of ruling which favored The People IMHO--but admit I already forget which ones. riversedge Monday #4

Maybe Trump will alienate some more women with a typical nasty comment. Would be a win for us. RoeVWade Monday #7

Yes, she has come across as a bit more PatSeg Monday #10

Oh, yes, T and A, as I like to call them, will ALWAYS be as extreme as possible. ShazzieB Monday #44

I'll be happy with an age or health related retirement PatSeg Monday #46

Age related retirement would be fine, except for one thing. ShazzieB Yesterday #48

I know, that's a terrifying thought PatSeg Yesterday #50

Absolutely. Those two would scrap elections altogether if they could. peppertree Yesterday #51

And as they've gotten older, PatSeg Yesterday #55

No doubt about it. peppertree Yesterday #57

Good old Bush the younger PatSeg 23 hrs ago #58

Heck of a job, Georgie. peppertree 22 hrs ago #59

With the current political climate, PatSeg 22 hrs ago #60

Ketchup will be flying... SheltieLover Monday #3

It appears that Amy Coney Barret has become the deciding vote on this Supreme Court. kentuck Monday #5

Does this ruling shoot down the proposed SAVE Act... kentuck Monday #6

No Sympthsical Monday #8

But this is the law until Congress votes to change it? kentuck Monday #12

Yes, this is law until Congress passes new law that changes it. In It to Win It Monday #16

Congress can still try to change those laws. Ms. Toad Monday #13

Yeah, the SAVE Act would absolutely end up in front of the Court Sympthsical Monday #19

Would that require homegirl Monday #20

Currently the SAVE act is being blocked by the Senate, Ms. Toad Monday #26

But what about the post office refusing to mail ballots in states that don't supply dump with the voter lists CurtEastPoint Monday #9

I believe this is being challenged PatSeg Monday #11

Blocked by Federal Court judge last week. paleotn Monday #25

AMAZING! Thanks! CurtEastPoint Monday #35

WTF. This should be a fucking no brainer since the vote was cast during an election. RedWhiteBlueIsRacist Monday #14

Some areas keep the post office open until midnight MichMan Monday #30

But now we have to hand mail to a post office employee for postmarking catrose Yesterday #53

Wow, a rare SCOTUS decision not in favor of the Murdoch Ministry Of Propaganda! What's next? Initech Monday #15

A good ruling MustLoveBeagles Monday #37

Well, we got to take whatever wins we can get! Initech Monday #38

I'm in agreement MustLoveBeagles Monday #40

I'm going to guess they pull nonsense on birthright citizenship EnergizedLib Monday #17

State CAN count them or MUST count them? Blumancru Monday #18

It depends on state laws MichMan Monday #22

It's important that blue voters in states that DON'T allow those delivered after the election day are aware of this. RockCreek Monday #47

Trump and Republicans will order post offices not to postmark mail ballots or not deliver them on time. Lonestarblue Yesterday #49

My immediate thought exactly. VTderry Yesterday #56

Just 'forget' to postmark ones in blue districts... kirby Monday #21

Or someone will come up with their own copy of a postmark. MichMan Monday #23

But will the post office post mark them? yellowcanine Monday #24

Good malaise Monday #27

Bottom line MoseShrute Monday #28

This jives with contract law - postmark dates a contract bucolic_frolic Monday #29

This would have been a no brainer to probably every other Supreme Court. crud Monday #31

That 2000 election, popsdenver Monday #41

The Extreme Court has the "shadow docket" Soul_of_Wit Monday #43

Why would anyone wait until election day to use a mail in ballot? MichMan Monday #32

The undersranding used to be because it would be counted and also because things change dramatically (esp in primaries) SSJVegeta Monday #34

An actual example usage of "procrastinate" from Merriam-Webster.com Soul_of_Wit Monday #39

Barrett has been the most democratic member of the anti-democracy court SSJVegeta Monday #33

Barrett just told the GOP how to change federal law Raven123 Monday #36

Just more evidence to me the Supreme Court must be expanded standingtall Monday #42

Scotland ABC123Easy Monday #45

They should have rejected this case to begin with. mdbl Yesterday #52

I am afraid if Trump gets total control over elections wee will have lost. Encouraging decision. Martin68 Yesterday #54