Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

haele

(15,711 posts)
32. They're really Eisenhower Republicans. The GOP doesn't want them.
Fri Jun 26, 2026, 04:24 PM
20 hrs ago

So they run as Democrats. Not necessarily bad, but definitely the old middle manager/union shop leader centerist types you'd find in the 50's and 60's. Comfortable enough they're not hungry for change, Centerist enough they're generally fair and accepting if not faced with unpleasantness or Radical pushback, and amenable enough that they will step in if they see someone in need - if it won't inconvenience them too much or if there's attaboys when the problem is "fixed".
Allies of Convenience.

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

My Dog.... NewHendoLib 22 hrs ago #1
We are definitetly going to need to take the house by more than 13. LuvLoogie 22 hrs ago #2
We definitely have a centrist problem. Emile 19 hrs ago #41
Without centrists Boo1 18 hrs ago #44
We have a centrist problem!! Emile 18 hrs ago #45
Seriously. What a bunch of drivel from these CivicGrief 17 hrs ago #55
You get to define what Boo1 16 hrs ago #67
See post 36 Emile 16 hrs ago #71
we know what it ISN'T Skittles 12 hrs ago #95
Not to mention centrists are terrible negotiators. They only ask GPV 1 hr ago #107
I agree PatSeg 1 hr ago #108
And "Centrists" are just Bettie 17 hrs ago #58
Bullshit Boo1 16 hrs ago #69
I strongly disagree LetMyPeopleVote 47 min ago #111
Moderates is a better description demosincebirth 54 min ago #109
Post removed Post removed 22 hrs ago #3
"Contract on America" orthoclad 22 hrs ago #5
Right? AStern 21 hrs ago #16
This "promise" is an agreement to orthoclad 21 hrs ago #19
Exactly Blue Full Moon 15 hrs ago #76
Shades of Newt Gingrich orthoclad 15 hrs ago #77
I'm good with most of that stuff. What are they against? mymomwasright 22 hrs ago #4
Y'know, all those things that "socialist" countries have. orthoclad 22 hrs ago #6
It's bad enough that the R's are trying to divide us Deuxcents 22 hrs ago #7
They seem to believe that everything happening today is fine and is mainstream and normal Quiet Em 22 hrs ago #8
They don't believe everything is fine. yardwork 21 hrs ago #10
They aren't offering anything Quiet Em 21 hrs ago #11
I agree mvd 2 hrs ago #100
Tom Suozzi is in NY Quiet Em 21 hrs ago #13
Then they should have some respect for the Dems who won in their districts. Why put out this Nanjeanne 20 hrs ago #25
What? I don't understand what you're saying. yardwork 17 hrs ago #49
How about you just read the free link to the Wash Post or maybe even Suozzi's own statement Nanjeanne 14 hrs ago #83
Are you suggesting that people should vote against them? yardwork 13 hrs ago #84
What are you talking about? Where did I say that? Voters get to choose. Im flummoxed. Nanjeanne 13 hrs ago #86
North Carolina's primaries are over. yardwork 13 hrs ago #87
My OP made no comment at all. I posted a Wash Post article and the actual Promise To America. Nanjeanne 13 hrs ago #88
These are your exact words in this thread: yardwork 13 hrs ago #89
Read my lips. I NEVER SUGGESTED ANYTHING ABOUT HOW SOMEONE SHOULD VOTE. Nanjeanne 13 hrs ago #91
Bashing Democratic candidates depresses the vote for them. yardwork 13 hrs ago #92
All of us at DU want to take back the House and we want all of our Democratic nominees to win Quiet Em 12 hrs ago #94
I'm not surprised to see the two from North Carolina. yardwork 22 hrs ago #9
I am mixed on this issue. Matthew28 21 hrs ago #12
My goal is to get a Democratic majority in Congress. yardwork 21 hrs ago #18
But they are attacking other Democrats in a not so subtle way. CivicGrief 17 hrs ago #59
How are they attacking other Democrats? yardwork 17 hrs ago #60
They said it was. Read the articles. Nanjeanne 16 hrs ago #65
We're all aware how civics works. CivicGrief 13 hrs ago #90
"Yes, but who wants a majority if we must sacrifice being pure to get there?" ... or something 😂🤣🙄 QueerDuck 51 min ago #110
It seems laughable but here we are. yardwork 46 min ago #112
And are the progressives who have won their primaries against "strong" borders and against some level Nanjeanne 21 hrs ago #23
We aren't in a big tent, I guess. aocommunalpunch 20 hrs ago #26
I personally think the Dems MustLoveBeagles 20 hrs ago #33
Which 'socialist' policies do they disagree with? NeoTrajan 21 hrs ago #14
I suspect they're appeasing their corporate donors LearnedHand 20 hrs ago #30
Here is my first stab at a list. yellow dahlia 17 hrs ago #53
They probably disagree with the DSA's call to defund the police, abolish prisons, and release all convicts. lapucelle 19 min ago #114
Post removed Post removed 21 hrs ago #15
Me too politics doesn't work MustLoveBeagles 20 hrs ago #34
they all need to be primaried hookaleft 21 hrs ago #17
Many of them should be on the top of the primary list for 2028 Renew Deal 21 hrs ago #20
Yeah, Europe is so extreme. However, I agree that "Socialist" is a loser in the .... ColoringFool 21 hrs ago #21
Socialism is the bogeyman pushed by the pukes LearnedHand 20 hrs ago #31
And they still will be labeled as Socialists from the right. CivicGrief 17 hrs ago #57
If it's a choice between a genuine Republican, Emile 21 hrs ago #22
What a completely pointless clump of words. Oneironaut 20 hrs ago #24
Post removed Post removed 20 hrs ago #27
So corruption and neoliberalism are totally okay LearnedHand 20 hrs ago #28
First of all Karma13612 20 hrs ago #29
They aren't trying to put forth any new ideas. They merely want to imply that these damn progressive Nanjeanne 19 hrs ago #36
What this usually means is Bettie 16 hrs ago #63
You got it. Nanjeanne 16 hrs ago #64
They're really Eisenhower Republicans. The GOP doesn't want them. haele 20 hrs ago #32
Eisenhower doesn't want them either. Nanjeanne 19 hrs ago #37
Not one F***ng word in the Promise to America about (for profit) HMO HealthCare. Ars Longa 19 hrs ago #35
That would impact the bottom line of Bettie 15 hrs ago #72
13 out of 200? SocialDemocrat61 19 hrs ago #38
Rule: If even one Democrat can be used to suppress support for the whole party, we're off to the races. betsuni 12 hrs ago #93
What's the point of this.... Etherealoc1 19 hrs ago #39
More Fettermans. Emile 19 hrs ago #40
Democratic Socialism is now mainstream AZProgressive 19 hrs ago #42
Oh alright ...OK, from now on.... you get TWO bread crusts a day-- instead of ONE. Ars Longa 18 hrs ago #43
Post removed Post removed 18 hrs ago #46
My thoughts too! Emile 18 hrs ago #47
Every one of these candidates is the Democratic candidate in their district. yardwork 17 hrs ago #61
This is likely going to be a theme durablend 18 hrs ago #48
I'm for socialism, taxing the billionaires into nonexistence, labor's freedom of movement equals capital's Prairie Gates 17 hrs ago #50
What's wrong with socialism? Violet_Crumble 17 hrs ago #51
As MLK Jr said Nanjeanne 1 hr ago #103
"We disagree with socialists," Suozzi said". yellow dahlia 17 hrs ago #52
Democratic Socialists aren't socialists. They are the real centrists. pat_k 17 hrs ago #54
Please corect tthe headline. These people are not at the "center" of anything. Bluetus 17 hrs ago #56
It was the Wash Post description. Nanjeanne 15 hrs ago #73
I suggest putting it in quotes then, because it is an opinion of theirs, certainly not a fact. Bluetus 15 hrs ago #75
Got any details to go with that rhetoric? Raven123 16 hrs ago #62
Oh goodie. mr715 16 hrs ago #66
Not just tepid dishwater - sour sink water that's been sitting there for three days with grease and soap in it . . . hatrack 16 hrs ago #68
PTA is Vague Classic "No Labels" stuff : Zero mention of Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid-- Ars Longa 16 hrs ago #70
"Fiscal discipline?" ... TAX THE RICH, and ... Martin Eden 15 hrs ago #74
A good start for the creation of a new Republican Deminpenn 15 hrs ago #78
The question is what are we going to do make difference in peoples lives. everyonematters 15 hrs ago #79
I'm glad my rep didn't sign that. 50 Shades Of Blue 14 hrs ago #80
Lol, gab13by13 14 hrs ago #81
I was almost convinced to vote for candidate Marlene Galn-Woods in Arizona but her decision to sign on to this in2herbs 14 hrs ago #82
Post removed Post removed 13 hrs ago #85
Aw, hell... duckworth969 12 hrs ago #96
Flipping a red district that Donald Trump won is an actual Nixie 10 hrs ago #97
I'm proud to say that we flipped two Nassau county districts blue in 2024, lapucelle 2 hrs ago #98
President Harry S Truman knew the type and warned us. Kid Berwyn 2 hrs ago #99
What a piece of shit document JBTaurus83 1 hr ago #101
Al politics is local. - Tip O'Neill mzmolly 1 hr ago #102
Putting lipstick on capitalism with colonial era values bucolic_frolic 1 hr ago #104
You can NOT have "fair" capialism without some johnnyfins 1 hr ago #105
Exactly JBTaurus83 29 min ago #113
The "Carville Fetterman axis" trying to look relevant n/t Munu 1 hr ago #106
James Carville supported Conor Lamb in 2022. N/T lapucelle 6 min ago #115
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»13 centrist Democrats sig...»Reply #32