Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

fujiyamasan

(2,192 posts)
2. Realistically less than half of what it is right now
Wed Jun 24, 2026, 11:37 PM
Wednesday

The company is valued at just over 2 trillion dollars right now. I could see a case to be made for about a quarter of that and that’s generous. Starlink is the only part of it that brings in any profit right now. It’s a legit business with decent cash flow. starship is taking a ton of capex, but I get it — rocket science isn’t easy and takes a lot of money. It also actually has a moat. I can see paying a premium for the optionality for potential future growth.

As for xAI? Who the fuck knows. That’s the part Musk threw in there to simply cover up the leveraged twitter purchase. This is also drawing a lot of capex on data centers. It’s pretty insane.

So really you could say it’s three companies in one. This may have been an interesting company to own if that latter wasn’t included. Instead it basically comes with his shitty Nazi chatbot, which apparently even SpaceX engineers don’t use (I believe they decided against using Groc).

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Not sure there is one lapfog_1 Wednesday #1
SpaceX does have a profitable core in the launch business paulkienitz Wednesday #4
They only thing they have that makes money edhopper Thursday #7
as I just said, paulkienitz Thursday #12
"Datacenters in space is simply ridiculous" Bluetus Thursday #5
Datacenters in orbit are a lot MORE ridiculous that colonizing Mars. paulkienitz Thursday #6
Of one thing you can be certain Bluetus Thursday #10
I disagree that it's pointless. paulkienitz Thursday #13
Why? Bluetus Thursday #15
Me too -- I agree with you. paulkienitz Thursday #17
There are legitimate scientific cases for the moon. Bluetus Friday #19
Realistically less than half of what it is right now fujiyamasan Wednesday #2
About tree fiddy. flvegan Wednesday #3
A buck three-eighty per share. MineralMan Thursday #8
Two penny nails, a bottle cap, an aggie and a crow feather.... haele Thursday #16
It is a pathological stock Johonny Thursday #9
About $40. Happy Hoosier Thursday #11
Yup, that's also the analysis I've seen LR3 Thursday #14
about $50 dollars Matthew28 Thursday #18
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What would be a fair pric...»Reply #2