Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Melon

(1,898 posts)

2. Iran was violating the agreement by limiting and preventing

Reply to Baitball Blogger (Original post)

Wed Jun 17, 2026, 10:30 PM

Jun 17

Access by nuclear inspectors. This is true.

https://www.reuters.com/article/world/iran-rejects-us-demand-for-un-visit-to-military-sites-idUSKCN1B9182/

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Baitball Blogger Miami Blue Rhiannon12866

35 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Who understands the effectiveness of Obama's nuclear deal with Iran? [View all] Baitball Blogger Jun 17 OP

They are going to explain everything regarding Miami Blue Jun 17 #1

Thank you. Baitball Blogger Jun 17 #4

Thanks for the heads-up. Talitha Jun 17 #27

Iran was violating the agreement by limiting and preventing Melon Jun 17 #2

Note the date. Aug 2017. By 2018, before US withdrawal, the IAEA was in country, inspecting, and certified compliance. RockRaven Jun 17 #6

Post removed Post removed Jun 17 #7

Yes there is no rewriting history. At the time Trump pulled the US out, every other party to the agreement RockRaven Jun 17 #12

You are placing an ad hoc rescue that at a certain short Melon Jun 17 #15

This is from the United Nations. Melon Jun 17 #17

So, any explanation for why, when I go the link you provided AZJonnie Jun 18 #33

But, this happened during Trump's term. Baitball Blogger Jun 17 #8

You are incorrect, per your own article. AloeVera Jun 17 #9

In every instance, Trump has been a bull in a china shop. Baitball Blogger Jun 17 #22

This is incorrect. They were not violating the agreement. tman Jun 17 #16

"This is true" dpibel Jun 17 #30

From the article you linked to: EarlG Jun 17 #31

Try this post Johnny2X2X Jun 17 #3

You interlocutor is, for lack of a better word, a liar. RockRaven Jun 17 #5

You realize Wikipedia is written by...just anyone. Melon Jun 17 #11

You realize those numbers are citations and you can check whether they say what the article says? RockRaven Jun 17 #14

There's zero science behind it. Melon Jun 17 #18

Well, you got this bit right AZJonnie Jun 18 #34

Seems your post was indeed prescient AZJonnie Jun 18 #35

Inspectors from the atomic energy agency were granted continuous lostincalifornia Jun 17 #10

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Melon Jun 17 #13

They were fully compliant while the JCPOA was active. tman Jun 17 #20

See below. Melon Jun 17 #21

That's from 12 June 2025, so my point still stands. tman Jun 17 #25

What is also conveniently omitted is that inspectors were refused entry after lostincalifornia Jun 17 #28

It was a starting point, and throwing that agreement out instead of using it lostincalifornia Jun 17 #23

What did they expect when trump unilaterally pulled out of the agreement? lostincalifornia Jun 17 #26

This is not true per the atomic energy agency and the UN.... Melon Jun 17 #19

You are citing a judgment from 2025 about activity from 2019 and onward RockRaven Jun 17 #24

Exactly. Trump unilaterally tore up that agreement in 2017. Why would some lostincalifornia Jun 17 #29

knr ... bookmarked ... cliffside Jun 18 #32