Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Baitball Blogger

(52,903 posts)
Wed Jun 17, 2026, 10:24 PM Jun 17

Who understands the effectiveness of Obama's nuclear deal with Iran? [View all]

I am having an argument with someone who said that Obama's contract was ineffective because Iran wasn't allowing people into the country to come in to inspect their facilities to see if they were collecting more than the 3% uranium allowed by the agreement. Per Obama, this was how they would be able to determine if Iran was acquiring enough nuclear supplies to build a bomb.

From what I remember, Trump came in and blew up everything that previous presidents (especially Obama) had put together, for no other reason than he's reckless and arrogant.

Anyway, whatever you want to add or correct, please feel free to do.

35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
They are going to explain everything regarding Miami Blue Jun 17 #1
Thank you. Baitball Blogger Jun 17 #4
Thanks for the heads-up. Talitha Jun 17 #27
Iran was violating the agreement by limiting and preventing Melon Jun 17 #2
Note the date. Aug 2017. By 2018, before US withdrawal, the IAEA was in country, inspecting, and certified compliance. RockRaven Jun 17 #6
Post removed Post removed Jun 17 #7
Yes there is no rewriting history. At the time Trump pulled the US out, every other party to the agreement RockRaven Jun 17 #12
You are placing an ad hoc rescue that at a certain short Melon Jun 17 #15
This is from the United Nations. Melon Jun 17 #17
So, any explanation for why, when I go the link you provided AZJonnie Jun 18 #33
But, this happened during Trump's term. Baitball Blogger Jun 17 #8
You are incorrect, per your own article. AloeVera Jun 17 #9
In every instance, Trump has been a bull in a china shop. Baitball Blogger Jun 17 #22
This is incorrect. They were not violating the agreement. tman Jun 17 #16
"This is true" dpibel Jun 17 #30
From the article you linked to: EarlG Jun 17 #31
Try this post Johnny2X2X Jun 17 #3
You interlocutor is, for lack of a better word, a liar. RockRaven Jun 17 #5
You realize Wikipedia is written by...just anyone. Melon Jun 17 #11
You realize those numbers are citations and you can check whether they say what the article says? RockRaven Jun 17 #14
There's zero science behind it. Melon Jun 17 #18
Well, you got this bit right AZJonnie Jun 18 #34
Seems your post was indeed prescient AZJonnie Jun 18 #35
Inspectors from the atomic energy agency were granted continuous lostincalifornia Jun 17 #10
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Melon Jun 17 #13
They were fully compliant while the JCPOA was active. tman Jun 17 #20
See below. Melon Jun 17 #21
That's from 12 June 2025, so my point still stands. tman Jun 17 #25
What is also conveniently omitted is that inspectors were refused entry after lostincalifornia Jun 17 #28
It was a starting point, and throwing that agreement out instead of using it lostincalifornia Jun 17 #23
What did they expect when trump unilaterally pulled out of the agreement? lostincalifornia Jun 17 #26
This is not true per the atomic energy agency and the UN.... Melon Jun 17 #19
You are citing a judgment from 2025 about activity from 2019 and onward RockRaven Jun 17 #24
Exactly. Trump unilaterally tore up that agreement in 2017. Why would some lostincalifornia Jun 17 #29
knr ... bookmarked ... cliffside Jun 18 #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Who understands the effec...