Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

GreatGazoo

(4,790 posts)
22. Futures lock in a price right now
Thu Jun 4, 2026, 01:28 PM
Jun 4

All of the large companies which use lots of gasoline, diesel and jet fuel, have traders on staff who buy and trade oil futures.

In a sense it is the oil companies who are selling short. eg they are selling December's oil right now so even if the price goes way up they are locked in and must deliver at $80. That is why UPS, AA, Pepsi, Amazon, etc. buy futures -- it lets them know what their costs are going to be. The airlines are a big one. You can buy a ticket right now for Thanksgiving travel so the airline needs to know what they will pay for fuel in November ($82) so that they can price their tickets.

Those stair step declines of about $2 per month in futures prices mean that in general the market sees more alternatives to Hormuz oil becoming available the further into the future you look. Part of that is that they know which pipelines can move oil to other delivery points such as the Red Sea and how much can be moved by rail. In general there has been an oversupply of oil ever since covid which drove prices down last year to about $57. They can't make money unless oil is above $60 so they usually start a war or sanctions or do whatever every time the price of oil goes below $60. Sure enough last year they attacked Iran and snatched Maduro. That pushed prices up not much until Feb 28. Now they have halted sanctions on Russian oil to increase supply to compensate for the Hormuz situation and keep oil under $100. Ideally they want oil between $65 and $80. Once it goes above $80 countries start replacing it with coal, solar, nuke, mass transit, work from home, etc. That can destroy demand in the long term so they don't want oil to stay high. It is big ugly game.

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The shit is on the wing orangecrush Jun 4 #1
The storage cushion is fudgy. bucolic_frolic Jun 4 #2
President Bone Spurs had a plan to get out of Vietnam. Emile Jun 4 #3
Daddy's not buying his way out of this one. dem4decades Jun 4 #4
From another perspective cachukis Jun 4 #5
there's definitely been some adaptation... but still a lot has been kept afloat by the reserves that are likely to run LymphocyteLover Jun 4 #27
No question. One of my worries is the takeover of cachukis Jun 4 #31
Absolutely. I totally agree on all those points. The stock market is particularly a mess IMO LymphocyteLover Jun 4 #32
Have invested mostly in real estate over the last cachukis Jun 4 #34
Why would " Diesel goes first"??? Melon Jun 4 #6
800,000 to 1.2 million SamuelTheThird Jun 4 #11
It's one country. Multiply across all oil producing Melon Jun 4 #41
Yes, but the key is how long the strait stays closed and how quickly the reserves run out LymphocyteLover Jun 4 #28
Diesel is often made from mideastern crude while gasoline is made from US crude JT45242 Jun 4 #30
Not In The US, Though ProfessorGAC Jun 5 #45
Completely wrong. GreatGazoo Jun 4 #7
lol@your link SamuelTheThird Jun 4 #10
You ignored all the numbers to nitpick about semantics GreatGazoo Jun 4 #15
Are America's strategic reserves at a 40 year low right before the summer season? SamuelTheThird Jun 4 #19
Traders in Singapore, Beijing and Mumbai aren't duped by whatever Trump says GreatGazoo Jun 4 #36
This message was self-deleted by its author LymphocyteLover Jun 4 #29
Futures Are Not Delivery modrepub Jun 4 #39
"futures price contracts probably isn't a good predictor of actual future prices" -- meaning spot prices, yes GreatGazoo Jun 4 #42
Future Prices Are Not Necessarily modrepub Jun 5 #43
No. For anyone holding a March contract at $63 their price in March was $63 GreatGazoo Jun 5 #44
Appreciate your insight as I'm an admitted economic idiot. I can see where Exxon would be trying to "warn" Cheezoholic Jun 4 #21
Futures lock in a price right now GreatGazoo Jun 4 #22
Admittedly, Im no expert or even amateur...but SamuelTheThird Jun 4 #35
Since oil is sold as futures there is more profit when buyers panic about the future GreatGazoo Jun 4 #37
All hinging on a deal that isn't going to happen SamuelTheThird Jun 4 #38
Last week Exxon Mobil warned that oil inventories will fall to record low levels in coming weeks LymphocyteLover Jun 4 #33
Demand destruction WSHazel Jun 4 #8
"one of the key reasons that Trump started this conflict was to increase energy prices"-- agree LymphocyteLover Jun 4 #25
And it's all part of the plan... 2naSalit Jun 4 #9
Excellent summation. Kid Berwyn Jun 4 #12
I don't think the Strait of Hormuz never reopening is going to happen, but it will not reopen without a major shock ToxMarz Jun 4 #13
Agree. Thanks for the link. LymphocyteLover Jun 4 #24
Kick dalton99a Jun 4 #14
MAGA does the full collapse kairos12 Jun 4 #16
First the bastids want to grift off it, if they can. GreenWave Jun 4 #17
But I thouight it would be open in two weeks. AverageOldGuy Jun 4 #18
That's the point. Blue Full Moon Jun 4 #20
Unbelievably awful LymphocyteLover Jun 4 #23
It's happening now as we speak. marble falls Jun 4 #26
Remember that the UAE left OPEC a few weeks ago WSHazel Jun 4 #40
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If the Strait of Hormuz d...»Reply #22