Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Sympthsical

(11,257 posts)
12. We should've done better
Wed Jun 3, 2026, 11:24 AM
Jun 3

It is what it is. If you're good, you'll remain good. If you're struggling with costs of living, nothing will unfold to meaningfully ameliorate that. The powers in Sacramento got what they wanted out of this. It's not even going to be a conversation.

California needs better candidates, but the state party has no incentive to change. How this primary unfolded was a total shitshow from start to finish.

My silver lining is that Saikat Chakrabarti looks like he's being forcefully sent packing. That is satisfying. And so long Porter. She showed voters who she was - and they believed her.

I will say, the polls were, at least so far, really bad in all this. Hard to say. We've only counted about half the votes, but the same day voting and early mail votes have been different than the polling implied. We'll have to see final numbers before knowing where everything broke in the past week.

On the plus side, I may now proceed to not care about any of this. All the Democrats on my ballot will easily win in November.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I am very hopeful for Becerra pinkstarburst Jun 3 #1
Hopefully Steyer won't run as a third party candidate. choie Jun 3 #6
There is no sore loser clause in Ca? LisaL Jun 3 #7
California has long-standing "sore loser" laws that have been upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court. QueerDuck Jun 3 #8
Well, let's hope so, anyway. calimary Jun 3 #15
Hope? It's a freaking Blue state law. paleotn Jun 3 #19
Agreed. The infighting would have been nauseating. Voters aren't Nixie Jun 3 #2
I agree Unwind Your Mind Jun 3 #3
Yep. If you add all the primary voters for all the democrats in the running, LisaL Jun 3 #4
I don't live in California AZProgressive Jun 3 #5
Trump is extremely un popular in California BlueWaveNeverEnd Jun 3 #16
Steyer vs Becerra would have been my preference. CoopersDad Jun 3 #9
We would have found out more about both candidates Bobstandard Jun 3 #10
Agree. I'll vote for Becerra and he will win but nothing will change in CA with him as govenor. Which is a shame as CA beaglelover Jun 3 #11
Exactly my feeling about this. Sympthsical Jun 3 #13
We should've done better Sympthsical Jun 3 #12
I'm on the opposite coast so I have no skin in the game Quiet Em Jun 3 #14
It can easily happen in a jungle primary, if voters are split and can't decide. LisaL Jun 3 #17
I hate that any republican gets any votes anywhere in any election. maxsolomon Jun 3 #18
Word is that Becerra will defeat Hilton handily. ananda Jun 3 #20
Steyer is still in the running people Jun 3 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»We got the best outcome i...»Reply #12