Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onenote

(46,241 posts)
1. The two trump judges are district court judges appointed during Trump's first term
Tue May 26, 2026, 10:15 PM
7 hrs ago

Neither was controversial One was confirmed by voice vote and the other received 21 Democratic votes for confirmation.

The question is whether an attempt will be made to have the case re-heard "en banc" -- by the full 11th Circuit. None of the three judges ruling in the case have a say in that decision, which is made by a vote of the "active" judges on the court. In this case the three judges initially deciding the matter were a senior appellate judge and two district court judges.

Rehearing en banc thus, if sought, would be decided by a vote of the 12 current judges, assuming none of them recuse themselves. There are six Trump judges, three Obama judges, two Biden judges and one GW Bush judge. It takes a majority -- in other words seven -- judges to vote for rehearing. In all likelihood that means the GW Bush judge holds the deciding vote since the six Trump judges probably would vote for rehearing.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump Judges Go Scorched ...»Reply #1