Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

EverHopeful

(707 posts)

29. I've actually come to enjoy many of the shortenings mentioned here

Reply to choie (Original post)

Sun May 24, 2026, 02:22 AM

11 hrs ago

Not sure why.

One usage that still irks me though, is what feels like an overuse of "concerning." Often things that should be described as horrifying, or at least worrying or troubling, are called "concerning." Always makes me think of Susan Collins.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

40 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

A grammatical observation and question [View all] choie 16 hrs ago OP

Twitter brain... SheltieLover 16 hrs ago #1

Hmm I remember Bush always said just "nuclear" choie 16 hrs ago #3

120 char communications destroy neural networks SheltieLover 16 hrs ago #5

Curiously, Jimmy Carter, a U.S. Navy nuclear engineer pronounced it the same way Brother Buzz 16 hrs ago #6

Another one The Blue Flower 16 hrs ago #2

YES!!! choie 16 hrs ago #4

And "Oval" instead of "Oval Office." wnylib 14 hrs ago #15

Cyber works really well as a noun LearnedHand 13 hrs ago #20

As in "Baron knows the cyber" Disaffected 12 hrs ago #22

People no longer canetoad 15 hrs ago #7

Lord, that's right! choie 15 hrs ago #8

Oh yeah. Drives me mad. No one donates. Gave and given are vanishing Easterncedar 14 hrs ago #14

Gifting or gifting grinds my gears nt r�is�n_dubh 11 hrs ago #25

Mine too canetoad 11 hrs ago #27

Like you said, it's grammar. I've had some experiance in the South and noticed a long time ago that folks shortened..... FadedMullet 15 hrs ago #9

Yep, that's one! Easterncedar 15 hrs ago #13

Very common in Appalachia r�is�n_dubh 11 hrs ago #26

Agree With You :: I Do (!) wyn borkins 15 hrs ago #10

Thanks wyn! choie 15 hrs ago #11

Yes, it seems to be an accelerating trend Easterncedar 15 hrs ago #12

You want to go with? radical noodle 14 hrs ago #16

I noticed that while watching the Darral Brooks trial. I thought it was a Wisconsin LoisB 14 hrs ago #18

It's also an Illinois thing. 3catwoman3 9 hrs ago #31

I think it's started in the last few years and not just in Wisconsin radical noodle 3 hrs ago #36

This isn't new. It's a function of how English is spoken by people in areas where there were a lot of settlers who spoke WhiskeyGrinder 5 hrs ago #35

Really? radical noodle 3 hrs ago #37

Language spreads. WhiskeyGrinder 2 hrs ago #40

Interesting. LoisB 2 hrs ago #39

I agree. You are not being intolerant. It seems as if everything is shorthand LoisB 14 hrs ago #17

Language is very fluid and fast moving LearnedHand 14 hrs ago #19

This! Sometimes I love playing with language and B.See 9 hrs ago #30

Oh dear - language changes. How painful. nt GenThePerservering 13 hrs ago #21

And ya, like I mean, your know, Disaffected 12 hrs ago #23

One reason I enjoy listening to BBC World Service and Al Jazeera Disaffected 12 hrs ago #24

I've noticed that, too. calimary 11 hrs ago #28

I've actually come to enjoy many of the shortenings mentioned here EverHopeful 11 hrs ago #29

I detest impactful. Clunky and awkward. 3catwoman3 9 hrs ago #32

"Impactful" is not very graceful but "influential" is definitely not a substitute LearnedHand 3 hrs ago #38

Leaving important words out leads sdfernando 8 hrs ago #33

The worst, to me, is calling a conspiracy theory a conspiracy. That's become all too common. n/t Mister Ed 8 hrs ago #34