Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Figarosmom

(13,527 posts)
6. They are using the passage of
Sat May 23, 2026, 03:10 AM
Yesterday

Another project that was to go on the same spot and never built a hundred years ago.


From AI
The Trump administration is using a design report approved by Congress in 1925 as the legal justification to build a 250-foot "United States Triumphal Arch" on Columbia Island without seeking new congressional authorization.Key details of the justification and project include:The 1925 Authorization: The original authorization was part of an Arlington Memorial Bridge Commission report that approved plans for two 166-foot masonry columns near the cemetery. While the bridge was built, the columns were never constructed.The Administration's Argument: The Trump administration argues that building this arch fulfills those century-old plans and that existing Interior Department land permits and contracting vehicles allow them to bypass a new congressional vote.The Controversy: Critics and legal experts point out that the 1925 report was meant for specific columns, not a massive 250-foot arch. Military veterans and historians have filed lawsuits against the administration, arguing that a monument of this size and scale requires explicit, modern-day congressional approval.You can track the ongoing political and legal disputes regarding the monument's authorization through detailed reporting on The Washington Post or view the specific objections on Politi

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Are they really going to ...»Reply #6