Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RoseTrellis

(207 posts)
98. Here's a great piece
Fri May 22, 2026, 08:38 PM
2 hrs ago
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/4718993-did-biden-break-his-one-term-pledge/

“ But the report most cited by those who believe a one-term promise was in place was from Politico in December 2019. “Biden’s top advisers and prominent Democrats outside the Biden campaign have recently revived a long-running debate whether Biden should publicly pledge to serve only one term, with Biden himself signaling to aides that he would serve only a single term,” reported Ryan Lizza. “While the option of making a public pledge remains available, Biden has for now settled on an alternative strategy: quietly indicating that he will almost certainly not run for a second term while declining to make a promise that he and his advisers fear could turn him into a lame duck and sap him of his political capital.”

Lizza would go on to quote “four people who regularly talk to Biden” who said “it is virtually inconceivable that he will run for reelection in 2024.” One “prominent adviser to the campaign” said explicitly, “he won’t be running for reelection.” That same advisor said that by signaling this one-term run, it would make the candidate a “good transition figure.”
That “transition” line is important, because it’s one Biden himself used publicly and on the record. “I view myself as a transition candidate,” Biden said at an online fundraiser in April 2020. In March of that year, at a rally where his eventual VP pick Kamala Harris was by his side, he used similar language: “I view myself as a bridge, not as anything else.””

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yes.. agree. But Barack Obama did get 43% of rural, although less than R opponent each time. hlthe2b Yesterday #1
A must read article at link, it will set off another angry round of pointless recriminations within the party. sop Yesterday #2
POTUS Biden was knee-capped from behind. PufPuf23 Yesterday #16
Biden performed horribly at the debate, you can't deny that. dem4decades 9 hrs ago #77
We weren't the one harping about MustLoveBeagles Yesterday #3
Indeed. I don't recall Kamala spending a lot of time on the culture war issues Redleg Yesterday #26
But, we think that people who aren't Bettie 9 hrs ago #69
Bingo MustLoveBeagles 9 hrs ago #74
The party and Biden should receive the majority of the criticism exboyfil Yesterday #4
Much as I respect Biden, I can't disagree. sop Yesterday #7
He flushed his legacy down the toilet Jose Garcia Yesterday #8
Biden got very bad advice and should have made the Prevention of Trump's Return a top priority. dalton99a Yesterday #10
Are we sure it was advice? Polybius Yesterday #24
Considering how long it took after the debate disaster, yes it was blind ego. thought crime 20 hrs ago #30
I believe that Joe Biden thought he was the only person capable of beating Trump MichMan 9 hrs ago #73
He still thought that too after the election Polybius 3 hrs ago #97
Partly ego fujiyamasan 6 hrs ago #85
While not the biggest Biden fan compared to many here, I can't agree with that EdmondDantes_ Yesterday #11
You are explaining WHY he didn't step down. thought crime 20 hrs ago #29
Agree, sadly. BannonsLiver 9 hrs ago #61
Clan you find a Biden quote ever saying he was going to leave after one term? karynnj Yesterday #14
Here you go Sewa Yesterday #15
That is others saying he won't run a second time karynnj Yesterday #18
The bottomline is that Biden Sewa Yesterday #25
Post removed Post removed 22 hrs ago #28
"Suggests" is not definitive Mad_Machine76 Yesterday #20
It's not typically done to primary a sitting president pinkstarburst 11 hrs ago #46
It's also not typical to insist a sitting President removes himself from the ballot and then Quiet Em 10 hrs ago #49
Anyone that dared to challenge him in the primary was attacked here MichMan 9 hrs ago #75
They were awful candidates Mad_Machine76 5 hrs ago #91
He could have easily declared victory after the 2022 mid terms and announced he wasn't running. BannonsLiver 9 hrs ago #62
Here's a great piece RoseTrellis 2 hrs ago #98
Exactly this. No one was excited about pinkstarburst 11 hrs ago #45
I could write a better "autopsy" in a few sentences. FascismIsDeath Yesterday #5
+1. And the migrant surge shouldn't have been allowed. That was a huge gift to Trump. dalton99a Yesterday #6
Message auto-removed Name removed Yesterday #13
That's one I don't see many addressing fujiyamasan Yesterday #17
This is a good analysis. yardwork 13 hrs ago #33
It's sad isn't it? fujiyamasan 10 hrs ago #57
Absolutely. yardwork 9 hrs ago #66
The Harris is for They/Them and Trump is for You commercial was brutal. bearsfootball516 10 hrs ago #54
They couldn't figure out how? yardwork 9 hrs ago #67
It's not true. Harris ran rebuttal ads in swing states pivoting to the economy. betsuni 4 hrs ago #96
No, she says she countered it by saying "Trump says a lot of things about me, but I know the thing you care about betsuni 5 hrs ago #95
Message auto-removed Name removed 10 hrs ago #59
Harris was forbidden to distance herself from the Biden years GreatGazoo 6 hrs ago #90
Agreed pinkstarburst 11 hrs ago #48
migrants benefit the nation, even the undocumented ones bigtree 10 hrs ago #60
Thank you for this MustLoveBeagles 6 hrs ago #83
But Schumer swore this would work! leftstreet Yesterday #9
sure, it was Schumer's fault that Democrats who showed up to defeat Trump by voting for Biden bigtree 12 hrs ago #35
He said they didn't need blue collar workers leftstreet 11 hrs ago #40
no he didn't bigtree 11 hrs ago #41
I was just quoting him leftstreet 11 hrs ago #42
no where is he quoted saying what you claimed bigtree 11 hrs ago #44
It was from The National Review leftstreet 10 hrs ago #56
I can read bigtree 9 hrs ago #63
Okay leftstreet 9 hrs ago #68
I personally believe he'll retire after the midterms bigtree 9 hrs ago #72
Sidestepping critical issues is not an autopsy. Incredible. Passages Yesterday #12
what 'critical issue' was more important to people than keeping a convicted felon in their own country out of office? bigtree 12 hrs ago #37
If you want to win, you cover all the bases. Passages 11 hrs ago #43
this is delusionary bigtree 10 hrs ago #50
The better question imo, why do an autopsy if you plan on omitting information that Passages 10 hrs ago #51
no, the question is, why does anyone need that falderal? bigtree 10 hrs ago #55
Are you serious? The party does an autopsy for answers, instead of assumptions. Passages 10 hrs ago #58
'the party' bigtree 9 hrs ago #64
Ken Martin commissioned the autopsy. You already seem to believe to know why we lost and how. Passages 9 hrs ago #70
not enough Dems showed up bigtree 9 hrs ago #76
You have done quite a bit of guessing. The point of an autopsy is to look at the issues objectively. Passages 9 hrs ago #79
the guessing is mostly from those assuming the DNC didn't look at the report bigtree 8 hrs ago #81
After losing twice to Trump, it is dangerous to assume anything. Passages 8 hrs ago #82
Thank you again MustLoveBeagles 6 hrs ago #84
Riiight. Let's all engage in more B.See Yesterday #19
Republicans write off rural America, give them nothing but culture wars and sit back taking their vote for granted. betsuni Yesterday #21
this shit is why we lost bigtree Yesterday #22
I agree. hamsterjill 23 hrs ago #27
Boy, I sure wish I could get away with lines like this at my own job - if I messed up and the boss asked me to explain Midwestern Democrat 12 hrs ago #36
What the hell happened in politics always ends up in finger pointing. tavernier 12 hrs ago #38
those folks people are dragging had ONE VOTE each in that election bigtree 11 hrs ago #39
AGAIN, EXACTLY THIS. Voters B.See 5 hrs ago #94
In the engineering world it's usually root cause analysis or 5-whys fujiyamasan 6 hrs ago #89
Word MustLoveBeagles 6 hrs ago #86
EXACTLY THIS, Bigtree. Again, B.See 5 hrs ago #93
Glad it was released, but why not address this part: Polybius Yesterday #23
Instead, it points to our failure with rural voters. Thanks. thought crime 20 hrs ago #31
Probably by consultants who want Bettie 9 hrs ago #71
I think it's more of a revolving door fujiyamasan 6 hrs ago #87
This is a disgrace. yardwork 13 hrs ago #32
most of the fools still dragging the party today like we're the opposition didn't bother to vote against the republicans bigtree 12 hrs ago #34
I think we're talking about two different things. yardwork 11 hrs ago #47
I think they're good for some things bigtree 10 hrs ago #53
And now Americans are learning the hard way why Rump is a disaster Bluestocking 10 hrs ago #52
And Trump practically advertised what he was going to do - retribution, dictatorship and all dalton99a 9 hrs ago #65
Same reason Kerry and Clinton lost gay texan 9 hrs ago #78
+1. It is an uphill battle dalton99a 8 hrs ago #80
Kamala most definitely did NOT go too far left with identity politics or social issues biocube 6 hrs ago #88
The best autopsy on the 2016 campaign was the NYTimes best seller "Shattered" GreatGazoo 5 hrs ago #92
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Facing intense internal p...»Reply #98