General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Facing intense internal pressure, DNC releases postelection autopsy that criticizes Kamala Harris [View all]bigtree
(94,688 posts)...but I'd be pressed to find more than the party faithful who even know what they are, much less depend on them to make up their minds about candidates.
I get everything about them except the importance of the 'analyzing,' which you can see only serves the party's detractors, and does absolutely nothing to generate the support for the party at elections that their critics claim they want DNC to produce at election time.
Look at what it's being used for here.
There's no true line between what their detractors say they want from DNC to any responsible or credible organizing effort; at least not in anything you've written here.
What is the throughline from the analysis to getting voters? I'd guess it's going to fall right along individual political aims, rather than some universal appeal.
That's because the best of what the DNC does is a crap shoot of disbursing resources they generate through their outreach to viable candidates. The messaging complaints aren't any better at generating voters than whatever the DNC is politicking with, so it's a wonder any of these folks complaining about them believe they have something substantive to offer that would get more people to vote Democratic.
I mean, the entire campaign was full of these people grandstanding against this Democrat or another Democratic org like THAT was the bee's knees of political opposition, instead of just going straight after republicans.
I mean, when should we have expected the actual support of the Democratic party in that election to begin from those folks?