Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Why 5-4? [View all]

ProfessorGAC

(77,318 posts)
2. At The Very Least, It Should Have...
Tue May 19, 2026, 02:04 PM
Tuesday

...had a term that was the same period of time from the founding of the country to the legislation.
It took 189 years to get to that point. The legislation should not have needed reauthorization until 2154.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Why 5-4? [View all] Nevilledog Tuesday OP
Unforgivable that it was not made permanent... 3catwoman3 Tuesday #1
At The Very Least, It Should Have... ProfessorGAC Tuesday #2
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why 5-4?»Reply #2