The redistricting battle began on Oct. 27, just days before the Nov. 4 state elections, when Democratic lawmakers introduced a constitutional amendment during a special session of the General Assembly that would allow congressional districts to be redrawn outside of the once-in-a-decade redistricting cycle tied to the census.
The proposal immediately sparked partisan fights over both the timing of the amendment and Democrats push to redraw Virginias congressional map ahead of the midterms.
The House advanced the proposal the next day, and the Senate approved it on Oct. 31 along party lines, pushing it forward as required by the multi-step constitutional process, which required the amendment to pass again in a subsequent session.
When lawmakers returned to Richmond in January, they approved the legislation a second time, but the measure soon became entangled in legal challenges.
After Hurley first ruled the amendment invalid, the Supreme Court of Virginia intervened, allowing the referendum to proceed despite the lower court ruling. At the time, justices made clear they were not resolving the broader legal questions, only ensuring that voters would have the opportunity to weigh in.
The courts earlier decision to allow the referendum onto the ballot led many legal observers to believe the amendment would likely survive if voters approved it.
-
The voters approved it by roughly 3%
https://virginiamercury.com/2026/05/08/supreme-court-of-virginia-strikes-down-redistricting-amendment-keeps-current-maps-in-place/
note : Bolding mine
✌🏻