Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Senate Republicans unveil $72 billion spending package, including a $1 billion line item for Grampy's ballroom [View all]LetMyPeopleVote
(181,437 posts)9. MaddowBlog-Republicans want to spend $1 billion in taxpayer money on Trump's $400 million ballroom
The controversial vanity project was already unpopular. The GOPs planned use of public funds is poised to make matters worse.
When the latest polling showed 2-to-1 opposition to the WH ballroom project, the survey question emphasized private financing.
— Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2026-05-05T12:57:58.925Z
Now congressional Republicans want to spend billion in taxpayer money on a 0 million project.
www.ms.now/rachel-maddo...
https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/republicans-want-1-billion-taxpayer-money-trump-ballroom
It was against this backdrop that GOP lawmakers unveiled the details of their reconciliation bill, which included an unexpected element. NBC News reported:
To be sure, the proposal isnt just about the ballroom. On the contrary, Republicans are pushing a $72 billion reconciliation package that includes, among other things, more than $38 billion for ICE, roughly $26 billion for CBP and an additional $5 billion for DHS.
To the surprise of no one, the bill also ignores the reform measures Democrats began pushing after the shooting deaths of Renee Good and Alex Pretti in Minnesota......
But its the $1 billion for security adjustments and upgrades to Trumps ballroom vanity project thats likely to be among the most controversial parts of the Republicans plan.
In case this isnt obvious, the White House boasted last summer that the price tag for the ballroom would be $200 million, and every penny would come from private donations. By October, the price tag had grown to $250 million. Soon after, it was $300 million. Late last year, it was up to $400 million though, again, the official line was that American taxpayers wouldnt be on the hook for the costs at all, even as the White House went out of its way to hide the identities of donors......
Put another way, congressional Republicans expect the public to pay $1 billion for a $400 million ballroom.
Well learn soon enough whether and to what extent the legislation changes in the coming days and weeks, but for now, GOP officials should probably keep in mind that polls show 2-to-1 opposition to the White House ballroom project, and thats when the survey question emphasized private financing. Watch this space.
Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, [on Monday night] released his committees part of the long-term Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Border Patrol funding bill, which includes $1 billion for security features related to the White House ballroom.
The funding could not be used for non-security elements, according to the legislative text.
To be sure, the proposal isnt just about the ballroom. On the contrary, Republicans are pushing a $72 billion reconciliation package that includes, among other things, more than $38 billion for ICE, roughly $26 billion for CBP and an additional $5 billion for DHS.
To the surprise of no one, the bill also ignores the reform measures Democrats began pushing after the shooting deaths of Renee Good and Alex Pretti in Minnesota......
But its the $1 billion for security adjustments and upgrades to Trumps ballroom vanity project thats likely to be among the most controversial parts of the Republicans plan.
In case this isnt obvious, the White House boasted last summer that the price tag for the ballroom would be $200 million, and every penny would come from private donations. By October, the price tag had grown to $250 million. Soon after, it was $300 million. Late last year, it was up to $400 million though, again, the official line was that American taxpayers wouldnt be on the hook for the costs at all, even as the White House went out of its way to hide the identities of donors......
Put another way, congressional Republicans expect the public to pay $1 billion for a $400 million ballroom.
Well learn soon enough whether and to what extent the legislation changes in the coming days and weeks, but for now, GOP officials should probably keep in mind that polls show 2-to-1 opposition to the White House ballroom project, and thats when the survey question emphasized private financing. Watch this space.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Senate Republicans unveil $72 billion spending package, including a $1 billion line item for Grampy's ballroom [View all]
Miles Archer
13 hrs ago
OP
First it was 200 million $s, then 400 million $s, and now it is @ 1 billion $s and what about being privately ....
Botany
12 hrs ago
#3
You gotta wonder just how big the kick backs and grifts will be on this project?
Botany
11 hrs ago
#17
So what's going to happen to all those millions already donated? Will the donors be refunded....
OGBuzz
12 hrs ago
#5
MaddowBlog-Republicans want to spend $1 billion in taxpayer money on Trump's $400 million ballroom
LetMyPeopleVote
11 hrs ago
#9
The entire reason for that 'attempted assassination' ploy. Price goes up when they say the word
travelingthrulife
11 hrs ago
#18
Truly. Either they think the election is fixed or they really are that dumb.
Biophilic
9 hrs ago
#29
The GOP owns both Dominion Voting Systems and E.S.& S. Voting Systems. In 2024 they had firmware
Botany
8 hrs ago
#31
It was a lie like Mexico paying for the wall. And It's not just the ballroom, it's also the Hitler Bunker underneath.
ChicagoTeamster
10 hrs ago
#23
"What happened to the ballroom being paid for by private funds?" asked political strategist Reed Galen......
COL Mustard
5 hrs ago
#41
Gee, look at my ballroom, and my hats, and my happy meal toys, and pictures of me, and me and more me.
twodogsbarking
3 hrs ago
#45
White House officials said that the legislation would authorize the entire project -- including the aboveground ballroom
LetMyPeopleVote
3 hrs ago
#46
Whoa! If I suddenly tear down part of a historic building, can I get $1 billion too?
struggle4progress
2 hrs ago
#47