Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PCB66

(154 posts)
48. Ten years ago we never thought that the SC
Sun May 3, 2026, 10:55 AM
13 hrs ago

would be six Conservatives to three Liberals. But speaking of reality that is why Democrats are calling for more Supreme Court Justices. So that it will be more balanced.

The reality is also that if that happens we could be an election or two away from being exactly where we started from.

Getting more SC Justices may seem like a fix but it could be short lived and come back to bite us in the ass.

The path to getting a proper Supreme Court is really simple. Elect the people that you think will appoint the Justices that have the Judicial record and temperament that reflects your political leanings.

Like Obama said "elections have consequences". He appointed two SC Justices. When Trump got elected he appointed three.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'm white, 68 and living on SS orangecrush Wednesday #1
Seconded here, orangecrush! slightlv Wednesday #10
Similar situation here orangecrush Wednesday #13
Me too. Us seniors are lucky that we had it good for many years. kerry-is-my-prez Friday #23
Sums it up nicely. orangecrush Friday #26
Sums it up nicely. orangecrush Friday #27
I'm the same as you -misanthroptimist Friday #28
The KKKourt "ruling" pissed me off orangecrush Friday #29
The only white people he truly accommodates are the likes of Musk and Bezos fujiyamasan Saturday #46
And so, Just Jerome Wednesday #2
Excellent from Wendell Phillips: "Governments exist to protect the rights of minorities..." erronis Wednesday #3
Fast forwarding to the present time ... oldsoldierfadingfast Wednesday #6
this one exists to protect itself bigtree Thursday #18
Unfortunately a lotta truth there! electric_blue68 Friday #19
A professor I had for a class in American Law and Racism SidneyR Wednesday #4
What a wise observation. I wonder if that is widely held amongst the legal academics. erronis Wednesday #7
Not just white supremacy, rich white supremacy. kerry-is-my-prez Friday #22
Up next, they will try to make segregation in education, housing, and work legal again. ShazamIam Wednesday #5
Oh, yes - of course. And then remove that pesky amendment about women's rights. erronis Wednesday #8
I agree it is likely, they can claim the original documents don't include women and the amendments that recognize women ShazamIam Wednesday #9
I was pleased to see your reply in the Justice Elena Kagan thread. erronis Wednesday #11
I am loving that there are 4 women on the U.S. Supreme Court even if one of them is a conservative. ShazamIam Thursday #16
Circumvention of Brown v. Board already began misanthrope Friday #40
Kick dalton99a Wednesday #12
John Roberts' wet dream mcar Wednesday #14
Missed the SC ruling that prohibits Civil Rights group suing in regards to VRA sec 2 said discriminations back then... electric_blue68 Wednesday #15
Supreme Court reform and accountability needed in the next Dem Congress bigtree Thursday #17
More twisted than a pretzel! This is really bad sh!t ! electric_blue68 Friday #20
The problem with that PCB66 Friday #25
Hmm, welp, you have a point electric_blue68 Friday #35
Make it a hundred dpibel Friday #38
The problem is PCB66 Friday #41
All the more reason to have a massive Supreme Court dpibel Friday #43
My point is that PCB66 Saturday #45
You'd apparently be surprised by reality dpibel Saturday #47
Ten years ago we never thought that the SC PCB66 13 hrs ago #48
I cannot believe the evil that these people (Republicans) are doing. kerry-is-my-prez Friday #21
I live in an area with large Hispanic populations Melon Friday #24
DURec leftstreet Friday #30
It's one thing to reverse precedent. But it's another thing to strike down established legislation Buckeyeblue Friday #31
The Constitution is more fragile than most of us realize PCB66 Friday #39
The MAGAts aren't real crazy about women of any color either. F*ck all of them. Greybnk48 Friday #32
That's their goal. I don't think they've won yet, in spite of the setbacks. Martin68 Friday #33
"Colorblind" has a whole new meaning when used by this court. Buddyzbuddy Friday #34
White male...... Hope22 Friday #36
The nation is back to accommodating the morbidly wealthy, white, male robber barons. debsy Friday #37
One of the worst set backs in American history. Passages Friday #42
Ok to revolt now...? Six117 Friday #44
That's been a long time goal by much of the right themaguffin 10 hrs ago #49
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The nation is back to acc...»Reply #48